Cited by 23Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental ImpactsEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicalsPharmacological Effects and Assays

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Do Cattle Growth Hormones Pose an Environmental Risk?

Renner, Rebecca·2002·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

Preliminary data suggest that hormone-adulterated runoff from cattle feedlots could be affecting local fish.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es022301+

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 23

Metadata

Authors
Renner, R.
Corresponding author
Renner, Rebecca
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2002-05-01
Volume
36
Issue
9
Pages
194A-197A
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2055078771
Cited by
23
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 2
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Pharmacological Effects and Assays
Keywords
environmental risk, feedlot runoff, fish effects, endocrine disruptors
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Feed, Animal Husbandry, Cattle, Cyprinidae, Data Collection, Environmental Monitoring, Water Movements, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Risk Assessment, Anabolic Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Do Cattle Growth Hormones Pose an Environmental Risk? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es022301+
The paper
Renner, R. (2002). Do Cattle Growth Hormones Pose an Environmental Risk? Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es022301%2B