The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The 1.7 Kilogram Microchip: Energy and Material Use in the Production of Semiconductor Devices
Abstract
The scale of environmental impacts associated with the manufacture of microchips is characterized through analysis of material and energy inputs into processes in the production chain. The total weight of secondary fossil fuel and chemical inputs to produce and use a single 2-gram 32MB DRAM chip are estimated at 1600 g and 72 g, respectively. Use of water and elemental gases (mainly N2) in the fabrication stage are 32,000 and 700 g per chip, respectively. The production chain yielding silicon wafers from quartz uses 160 times the energy required for typical silicon, indicating that purification to semiconductor grade materials is energy intensive. Due to its extremely low-entropy, organized structure, the materials intensity of a microchip is orders of magnitude higher than that of "traditional" goods. Future analysis of semiconductor and other low entropy high-tech goods needs to include the use of secondary materials, especially for purification.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Designing Resilient, Sustainable Systems
Fiksel, J. (2003) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es0344819 · Cited by 831
Environmental impacts of hybrid and electric vehicles—a review
Hawkins, T. R., Gausen, O. M., & Strømman, A. H. (2012) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-012-0440-9 · Cited by 601
Keeping the Energy Debate Clean: How Do We Supply the World's Energy Needs?
Abbott, D. (2010) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2009.2035162 · Cited by 386
Environmental effects of information and communications technologies
Williams, E. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10682 · Cited by 304
Self-citationWilliams, E. (2004) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es035152j · Cited by 262
Self-citationA Comparison of Reusable and Disposable Perioperative Textiles: Sustainability State-of-the-Art 2012
Overcash, M. (2012) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1213/ane.0b013e31824d9cc3 · Cited by 240
Rebound effects of progress in information technology
Hilty, L. M., Köhler, A., Von Schéele, F., Zah, R., & Ruddy, T. (2006) · Poiesis & Praxis · doi:10.1007/s10202-005-0011-2 · Cited by 97
Consumption-Weighted Life Cycle Assessment of a Consumer Electronic Product Community
Ryen, E. G., Babbitt, C. W., & Williams, E. (2015) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es505121p · Cited by 48
Self-citationQuantifying the global eco-footprint of wearable healthcare electronics
Yang, C., Wang, B., Wan, J., Kamath, A., You, F., & Tian, B. (2026) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09819-w · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Williams, E. D., Ayres, R. U., & Heller, M.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2002-10-25
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 5504-5510
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W1969963291
- Cited by
- 417
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.