The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Binding of Mercury(II) to Dissolved Organic Matter: The Role of the Mercury-to-DOM Concentration Ratio
Abstract
The binding of Hg(II) to dissolved organic matter (DOM; hydrophobic acids isolated from the Florida Everglades by XAD-8 resin) was measured at a wide range of Hg-to-DOM concentration ratios using an equilibrium dialysis ligand exchange method. Conditional distribution coefficients (K(DOM)') determined by this method were strongly affected by the Hg/DOM concentration ratio. At Hg/DOM ratios below approximately 1 microg of Hg/mg of DOM, we observed very strong interactions (K(DOM)' = 10(23.2+/-1.0) L kg(-1) at pH = 7.0 and I = 0.1), indicative of mercury-thiol bonds. Hg/DOM ratios above approximately 10 microg of Hg/mg of DOM, as used in most studies that have determined Hg-DOM binding constants, gave much lower K(DOM)' values (10(10.7+/-1.0) L kg(-1) at pH = 4.9-5.6 and I = 0.1), consistent with Hg binding mainly to oxygen functional groups. These results suggest that the binding of Hg to DOM under natural conditions (very low Hg/DOM ratios) is controlled by a small fraction of DOM molecules containing a reactive thiol functional group. Therefore, Hg/DOM distribution coefficients used for modeling the biogeochemical behavior of Hg in natural systems need to be determined at low Hg/DOM ratios.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Interactions between mercury and dissolved organic matter––a review
Ravichandran, M. (2004) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.11.011 · Cited by 1,254
Marine Biogeochemical Cycling of Mercury
Fitzgerald, W. F., Lamborg, C. H., & Hammerschmidt, C. R. (2007) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr050353m · Cited by 1,048
Hall, B. D., Aiken, G. R., Krabbenhoft, D. P., Marvin-DiPasquale, M., & Swarzenski, C. M. (2008) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2007.12.017 · Cited by 207
Self-citationHeavy Metal Sorption at the Muscovite (001)–Fulvic Acid Interface
Lee, S. S., Nagy, K. L., Park, C., & Fenter, P. (2011) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es201323a · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Haitzer, M., Aiken, G. R., & Ryan, J. N.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2002-07-17
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 3564-3570
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2048681523
- Cited by
- 434
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Binding of Mercury(II) to Dissolved Organic Matter: The Role of the Mercury-to-DOM Concentration Ratio. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es025699i
- The paper
- Haitzer, M., Aiken, G. R., & Ryan, J. N. (2002). Binding of Mercury(II) to Dissolved Organic Matter: The Role of the Mercury-to-DOM Concentration Ratio. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es025699i
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.