Cited by 275Water Treatment and DisinfectionAdvanced oxidation water treatmentAdvanced Photocatalysis Techniques

Experimental and Model Comparisons of Low- and Medium-Pressure Hg Lamps for the Direct and H2O2 Assisted UV Photodegradation of N-Nitrosodimethylamine in Simulated Drinking Water

Sharpless, Charles M., Linden, Karl G.·2003·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

Both low- and medium-pressure Hg lamps (LP and MP, respectively) were used as ultraviolet light (UV) sources to destroy N-nitrosodimethylamine in a synthetic "natural" water. The lamp performances were directly compared via the UV fluence-based rate constants, which demonstrates that LP and MP have virtually identical photonic efficiencies (fluence-based rate constants of 2.29E-3 and 2.35E-3 cm2/mJ, respectively). This indicates that the quantum yield for NDMA photolysis is independent of wavelength in the UVC region: a value of 0.30 mol/einstein is found at pH 8.1. Addition of 100 mg/L of H2O2 leads to a 30% increase in the LP fluence-based rate constant but does not alter the MP rate constant, likely due to the tradeoff between light screening by H2O2 and additional radical based degradation. However, in terms of the time-based rate constant, this level of H2O2 slightly enhances the LP performance but hinders the MP performance, suggesting that H2O2 is of little or no economic benefit for NDMA removal by UV. All these effects are explained by modeling the photochemistry according to standard equations. The model predicts that H2O2 may enhance NDMA removal for short optical path lengths but that light-screening by H2O2 may decrease the removal rates for optical path lengths typical of those found in UV reactors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es025814p

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sharpless, C. M., & Linden, K. G.
Affiliations
Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Linden, Karl G.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2003-03-22
Volume
37
Issue
9
Pages
1933-1940
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2036027318
Cited by
275
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 19
FWCI
4.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Water Treatment and Disinfection
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Advanced oxidation water treatment
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques
Keywords
N-nitrosodimethylamine, UV degradation, mercury lamp, low-pressure mercury lamp, medium pressure mercury lamp, hydrogen peroxide, UV-C, quantum yield, light screening, drinking water disinfection, photochemical modeling
MeSH terms
Dimethylnitrosamine, Mercury, Models, Theoretical, Nitrosamines, Photolysis, Pressure, Ultraviolet Rays, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Water Supply, Deuterium Oxide, Water Purification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review