Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,664

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Degradation of Organic Contaminants in Water with Sulfate Radicals Generated by the Conjunction of Peroxymonosulfate with Cobalt

Anipsitakis, George P., Dionysiou, Dionysios D.·2003·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

A highly efficient advanced oxidation process for the destruction of organic contaminants in water is reported. The technology is based on the cobalt-mediated decomposition of peroxymonosulfate that leads to the formation of very strong oxidizing species (sulfate radicals) in the aqueous phase. The system is a modification of the Fenton Reagent, since an oxidant is coupled with a transition metal in a similar manner. Sulfate radicals were identified with quenching studies using specific alcohols. The study was primarily focused on comparing the cobalt/peroxymonosulfate (Co/PMS) reagent with the traditional Fenton Reagent [Fe(II)/H2O2] in the dark, at the pH range 2.0-9.0 with and without the presence of buffers such as phosphate and carbonate. Three model contaminants that show diversity in structure were tested: 2,4-dichlorophenol, atrazine, and naphthalene. Cobalt/peroxymonosulfate was consistently proven to be more efficient than the Fenton Reagent for the degradation of 2,4-dichlorophenol and atrazine, at all the conditions tested. At high pH values, where the efficiency of the Fenton Reagent was diminished, the reactivity of the Co/PMS system was sustained at high values. When naphthalene was treated with the two oxidizing systems in comparison, the Fenton Reagent demonstrated higher degradation efficiencies than cobalt/peroxymonosulfate at acidic pH, but, at higher pH (neutral), the latter was proven much more effective. The extent of mineralization, as total organic carbon removed,was also monitored, and again the Co/PMS reagent demonstrated higher efficiencies than the Fenton Reagent. Cobalt showed true catalytic activity in the overall process, since extremely low concentrations (in the range of microg/L) were sufficient for the decomposition of the oxidant and thus the radical generation. The advantage of Co/PMS compared to the traditional Fenton Reagent is attributed primarily to the oxidizing strength of the radicals formed, since sulfate radicals are stronger oxidants than hydroxyl and the thermodynamics of the transition-metal-oxidant coupling.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es0263792

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Metadata

Authors
Anipsitakis, G. P., & Dionysiou, D. D.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2003-09-18
Volume
37
Issue
20
Pages
4790-4797
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2094731216
Cited by
1,664
References
2
FWCI
10.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.