The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Multibiomarker Approach To Environmental Assessment
Abstract
Incorporation of ecologically relevant biomarkers into routine environmental management programs has been advocated as a pragmatic means of linking environmental degradation with its causes. Here, suites of biomarkers, devised to measure molecular damage, developmental abnormality and physiological impairment, were combined with chemical analysis to determine exposure to and the effects of pollution at sites within Southampton Water (UK). Test species included a filter feeder, a grazer, and an omnivore to determine the sensitivity of organisms occupying different trophic levels. Linear regression confirmed a significant association between incidence of intersex in Littorina littorea and tributyltin (TBT) concentrations (R2 = 0.954) and between PAH metabolites in Carcinus maenas urine and PAHs in sediments (R2 = 0.754). Principal component analysis revealed a gradient of detrimental impact to biota from the head to the mouth of the estuary, coincident with high sediment concentrations of heavy metals, PAHs, and biocides. Multidimensional scaling identified C. maenas as the organism most sensitive to contamination. Carboxylesterase activity, metallothionein and total haemolymph protein were the most discriminating biomarkers among sites. This holistic approach to environmental assessment is encouraged as it helps to identify the integrated impact of chemical contamination on organisms and to provide a realistic measure of environmental quality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Neural Network Approach to the Biopsy Diagnosis of Early Acute Renal Transplant Rejection
Furness, Levesley, Luo, Taub, Kazi, Bates, & Nicholson (1999) · Histopathology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2559.1999.035005461.x · Cited by 37
Cited by
Do nanoparticles present ecotoxicological risks for the health of the aquatic environment?
Moore, M. N. (2006) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2006.06.014 · Cited by 1,253
Dissanayake, A., Galloway, T. S., & Jones, M. B. (2008) · Marine Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.marenvres.2008.07.006 · Cited by 43
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Galloway, T. S., Brown, R. J., Browne, M. A., Dissanayake, A., Lowe, D., Jones, M. B., & Depledge, M. H.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2004-01-27
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1723-1731
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W1979117963
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Multibiomarker Approach To Environmental Assessment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es030570+
- The paper
- Galloway, T. S., Brown, R. J., Browne, M. A., Dissanayake, A., Lowe, D., Jones, M. B., & Depledge, M. H. (2004). A Multibiomarker Approach To Environmental Assessment. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es030570%2B
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.