The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fluorescence Excitation−Emission Matrix Regional Integration to Quantify Spectra for Dissolved Organic Matter
Abstract
Excitation-emission matrix (EEM) fluorescence spectroscopy has been widely used to characterize dissolved organic matter (DOM) in water and soil. However, interpreting the > 10,000 wavelength-dependent fluorescence intensity data points represented in EEMs has posed a significant challenge. Fluorescence regional integration, a quantitative technique that integrates the volume beneath an EEM, was developed to analyze EEMs. EEMs were delineated into five excitation-emission regions based on fluorescence of model compounds, DOM fractions, and marine waters or freshwaters. Volumetric integration under the EEM within each region, normalized to the projected excitation-emission area within that region and dissolved organic carbon concentration, resulted in a normalized region-specific EEM volume (phi(i,n)). Solid-state carbon nuclear magnetic resonance (13C NMR), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) analysis, ultraviolet-visible absorption spectra, and EEMs were obtained for standard Suwannee River fulvic acid and 15 hydrophobic or hydrophilic acid, neutral, and base DOM fractions plus nonfractionated DOM from wastewater effluents and rivers in the southwestern United States. DOM fractions fluoresced in one or more EEM regions. The highest cumulative EEM volume (phi(T,n) = sigma phi(i,n)) was observed for hydrophobic neutral DOM fractions, followed by lower phi(T,n) values for hydrophobic acid, base, and hydrophilic acid DOM fractions, respectively. An extracted wastewater biomass DOM sample contained aromatic protein- and humic-like material and was characteristic of bacterial-soluble microbial products. Aromatic carbon and the presence of specific aromatic compounds (as indicated by solid-state 13C NMR and FTIR data) resulted in EEMs that aided in differentiating wastewater effluent DOM from drinking water DOM.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
PCR inhibitors - occurrence, properties and removal
Schrader, C., Schielke, A., Ellerbroek, L., & Johne, R. (2012) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05384.x · Cited by 2,118
Yang, Y., Zeng, Z., Zhang, C., Huang, D., Zeng, G., Xiao, R., Lai, C., Zhou, C., Guo, H., Xue, W., et al. (2018) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2018.05.093 · Cited by 691
Multiple Roles of Dissolved Organic Matter in Advanced Oxidation Processes
Yang, X., Rosario-Ortiz, F. L., Lei, Y., Pan, Y., Lei, X., & Westerhoff, P. (2022) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.2c01017 · Cited by 459
Self-citationChen, L., Gu, Y., Cao, C., Zhang, J., Ng, J.-W., & Tang, C. (2014) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2013.12.009 · Cited by 262
Qi, D., Liu, Y., Liu, Y., Liu, Z., Luo, Y., Xu, H., Zhou, X., Zhang, J., Yang, H., Wang, W., et al. (2020) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202004401 · Cited by 226
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, W., Westerhoff, P., Leenheer, J. A., & Booksh, K.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2003-11-15
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 5701-5710
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2042533040
- Cited by
- 6,319
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fluorescence Excitation−Emission Matrix Regional Integration to Quantify Spectra for Dissolved Organic Matter. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es034354c
- The paper
- Chen, W., Westerhoff, P., Leenheer, J. A., & Booksh, K. (2003). Fluorescence Excitation−Emission Matrix Regional Integration to Quantify Spectra for Dissolved Organic Matter. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es034354c
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.