The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Geochemical Controls on the Production and Distribution of Methylmercury in Near-Shore Marine Sediments
Abstract
We examined temporal differences in sedimentary production of monomethylmercury (MMHg) at three sites in Long Island Sound (LIS). Sediment-phase concentrations of Hg species decreased from west to east in LIS surface sediments, following the trend of organic matter. However, Hg methylation potentials, measured by incubation with an isotopic tracer (200Hg), increased from west to east. 200Hg methylation potentials were enhanced in August relative to March and June, attributable to differences in activity of sulfate-reducing bacteria. Organic matter and acid-volatile sulfide influenced the distribution coefficient (KD) of inorganic Hg (Hg(II) = total Hg - MMHg) and inhibited 200Hg methylation in surface sediments. 200Hg methylation varied inversely with the KD of Hg(II) and positively with the concentration of Hg(II), mostly as HgS0, in LIS pore waters. Accordingly, we posit that a principal control on MMHg production in low-sulfide, coastal marine sediments is partitioning of Hg(II) between particle and dissolved phases, which regulates availability of Hg substrate to methylating bacteria. Most of the partitioning in LIS sediments is due to Hg-organic associations. This suggests that reductions in the organic content of coastal sediment, a potential result of nutrient abatement programs intended to inhibit eutrophication of near-shore waters, could enhance MMHg production by increasing the bioavailability of the large reservoir of "legacy Hg" buried within the sediment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sulfate stimulation of mercury methylation in freshwater sediments
Gilmour, C. C., Henry, E. A., & Mitchell, R. (1992) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es00035a029 · Cited by 1,124
Fredrickson, J. K., Zachara, J. M., Kennedy, D. W., Dong, H., Onstott, T. C., Hinman, N. W., & Li, S.-M. (1998) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/s0016-7037(98)00243-9 · Cited by 807
Cited by
Khatri, N., & Tyagi, S. (2015) · Frontiers in Life Science · doi:10.1080/21553769.2014.933716 · Cited by 1,081
Marine Biogeochemical Cycling of Mercury
Fitzgerald, W. F., Lamborg, C. H., & Hammerschmidt, C. R. (2007) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr050353m · Cited by 1,048
Self-citationGeochemistry of Mercury in the Environment
Fitzgerald, W. F., & Lamborg, C. H. (2014) · Treatise on Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-095975-7.00904-9 · Cited by 275
Self-citationHall, B. D., Aiken, G. R., Krabbenhoft, D. P., Marvin-DiPasquale, M., & Swarzenski, C. M. (2008) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2007.12.017 · Cited by 207
Metadata
- Authors
- Hammerschmidt, C. R., & Fitzgerald, W. F.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2004-01-21
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1487-1495
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2044967210
- Cited by
- 362
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.