Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 333

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

New Method for Assimilable Organic Carbon Determination Using Flow-Cytometric Enumeration and a Natural Microbial Consortium as Inoculum

Hammes, Frederik A., Egli, Thomas·2005·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

The concentration of easily assimilable organic carbon (AOC) largely determines the microbiological stability of drinking water. However, AOC determination is often neglected in practice due to the complex and tedious nature of the conventional bioassay. The three major drawbacks of the conventional method are (1) a long assay time of 9-12 days, (2) the use of a labor-intensive enumeration technique (plating on growth media), and (3) limited information supplied by the use of selected pure cultures (Pseudomonas fluorescens P-17 and Spirillum NOX) for measuring a complex pool of natural bioavailable carbon compounds. A new method is proposed here, in which plating was replaced with fluorescence staining of total nucleic acids combined with flow cytometry as a rapid and straightforward growth enumeration method. This approach also allowed for the detection of inactive and/or unculturable microorganisms. Hence, the conventionally used pure cultures were replaced in the new AOC assay with a natural microbial consortium. It was shown that the flow-cytometric enumeration method could be used to establish complete growth curves for a natural microbial consortium growing on AOC. Compared to the end-point measurements of the conventional method, such kinetic data provide much clearer insight into the actual growth potential of a water.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es048277c

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Hammes, F. A., & Egli, T.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2005-03-31
Volume
39
Issue
9
Pages
3289-3294
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2142719894
Cited by
333
References
0
FWCI
4.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.