The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Electrochemical Oxidation as a Final Treatment of Synthetic Tannery Wastewater
Abstract
Vegetable tannery wastewaters contain high concentrations of organics and other chemicals that inhibit the activity of microorganisms during biological oxidations, so biorefractory organics that are not removed by biological treatment must be eliminated by a tertiary or advanced wastewater treatment. In this paper, the applicability of electrochemical oxidation as a tertiary treatment of a vegetable tannery wastewater was investigated by performing galvanostatic electrolysis using lead dioxide (Ti/PbO2) and mixed titanium and ruthenium oxide (Ti/TiRuO2) as anodes under different experimental conditions. The experimental results showed that both the electrodes performed complete mineralization of the wastewater. In particular, the oxidation took place on the PbO2 anode by direct electron transfer and indirect oxidation mediated by active chlorine, while it occurred on the Ti/TiRuO2 anode only by indirect oxidation. Furthermore, the Ti/PbO2 gave a somewhat higher oxidation rate than that observed for the Ti/TiRuO2 anode. Although the Ti/TiRuO2 required almost the same energy consumption for complete COD removal, it was more stable and did not release toxic ions, so it was the best candidate for industrial applications. With the Ti/TiRuO2 anode, the rate of tannery wastewater oxidation increased with the current density, pH, and temperature of the solution. These results strongly indicate that electrochemical methods can be applied effectively as a final treatment of vegetable tannery wastewater allowing the complete removal of COD, tannin, and ammonium and decolorization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Direct And Mediated Anodic Oxidation of Organic Pollutants
Panizza, M., & Cerisola, G. (2009) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr9001319 · Cited by 2,346
Self-citationAdvanced Oxidation Processes in Water/Wastewater Treatment: Principles and Applications. A Review
Oturan, M. A., & Aaron, J.-J. (2014) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643389.2013.829765 · Cited by 2,272
Martínez-Huitle, C. A., & Ferro, S. (2006) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/b517632h · Cited by 1,840
Tetracycline antibiotics in the environment: a review
Daghrir, R., & Drogui, P. (2013) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-013-0404-8 · Cited by 1,595
Electrochemical oxidation remediation of real wastewater effluents — A review
Garcia-Segura, S., Ocon, J. D., & Chong, M. N. (2018) · Process Safety and Environmental Protection · doi:10.1016/j.psep.2017.09.014 · Cited by 785
Metadata
- Authors
- Panizza, M., & Cerisola, G.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2004-09-04
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 5470-5475
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W1990437184
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electrochemical Oxidation as a Final Treatment of Synthetic Tannery Wastewater. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es049730n
- The paper
- Panizza, M., & Cerisola, G. (2004). Electrochemical Oxidation as a Final Treatment of Synthetic Tannery Wastewater. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es049730n
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.