The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biofilm Formation Characteristics of Bacterial Isolates Retrieved from a Reverse Osmosis Membrane
Abstract
High-quality water purification systems using reverse osmosis (RO) membrane separation have faced a major challenge related to biofilm formation on the membrane surface, or biofouling. To understand this issue, the biofilm formation characteristics of four bacterial isolates previously retrieved from an RO membrane treating potable water were investigated. Biofilm formation of all four isolates occurred to different extents in microtiter plates and could be related to one or more cell properties (hydrophobicity, surface charge, and motility). For Dermacoccus sp. strain RO12 and Microbacterium sp. strain RO18, bacterial adhesion was facilitated by cell surface hydrophobicity, and for Rhodopseudomonas sp. strain RO3, adhesion was assisted by its low surface charge. Sphingomonas sp. strain RO2 possessed both twitching and swarming motilities, which could be important in mediating surface colonization. Further, strains RO2, RO3, and RO12 did not exhibit swimming motility, suggesting that they could be transported to RO membrane surfaces by other mechanisms such as convective permeate flow. The biofilm formation of RO2 was further tested on different RO membranes made of cellulose acetate, polyamide, and thin film composite in continuous flow cell systems. The resultant RO2 biofilms were independent of membrane surface properties and this was probably related to the ex-opolysaccharides secreted bythe biofilm cells. These results suggested that RO2 could colonize RO membranes effectively and could be a potential fouling organism in RO membranes for freshwater purification.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Flagellar and twitching motility are necessary for Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm development
O'Toole, G. A., & Kolter, R. (1998) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.01062.x · Cited by 2,697
The role of bacterial cell wall hydrophobicity in adhesion
van Loosdrecht, M. C., Lyklema, J., Norde, W., Schraa, G., & Zehnder, A. J. (1987) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.53.8.1893-1897.1987 · Cited by 959
Cited by
Antifouling membranes for sustainable water purification: strategies and mechanisms
Zhang, R., Liu, Y., He, M., Su, Y., Zhao, X., Elimelech, M., & Jiang, Z. (2016) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c5cs00579e · Cited by 1,365
Bacterial adherence and biofilm formation on medical implants: A review
Veerachamy, S., Yarlagadda, T., Manivasagam, G., & Yarlagadda, P. K. (2014) · Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine · doi:10.1177/0954411914556137 · Cited by 583
Membrane technology in microalgae cultivation and harvesting: A review
Bilad, M. R., Arafat, H. A., & Vankelecom, I. F. J. (2014) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.07.008 · Cited by 327
Barraud, N., Storey, M. V., Moore, Z. P., Webb, J. S., Rice, S. A., & Kjelleberg, S. (2009) · Microbial Biotechnology · doi:10.1111/j.1751-7915.2009.00098.x · Cited by 289
Metadata
- Authors
- Pang, C. M., Hong, P., Guo, H., & Liu, W.-T.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-09-03
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 7541-7550
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2048016261
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biofilm Formation Characteristics of Bacterial Isolates Retrieved from a Reverse Osmosis Membrane. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es050170h
- The paper
- Pang, C. M., Hong, P., Guo, H., & Liu, W.-T. (2005). Biofilm Formation Characteristics of Bacterial Isolates Retrieved from a Reverse Osmosis Membrane. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es050170h
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.