The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High Flux Filtration Medium Based on Nanofibrous Substrate with Hydrophilic Nanocomposite Coating
Abstract
A novel high flux filtration medium, consisting of a three-tier composite structure, i.e., a nonporous hydrophilic nanocomposite coating top layer, an electrospun nanofibrous substrate midlayer, and a conventional nonwoven microfibrous support, was demonstrated for oil/water emulsion separations for the first time. The nanofibrous substrate was prepared by electrospinning of poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) followed by chemical cross-linking with glutaraldehyde (GA) in acetone. The resulting cross-linked PVA substrates showed excellent water resistance and good mechanical properties. The top coating was based on a nanocomposite layer containing hydrophilic polyether-b-polyamide copolymer or a cross-linked PVA hydrogel incorporated with surface-oxidized multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWNTs). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) examinations indicated that the nanocomposite layer was nonporous within the instrumental resolution and MWNTs were well dispersed in the polymer matrix. Oil/ water emulsion tests showed that this unique type of filtration media exhibited a high flux rate (up to 330 L/m2-h at the feed pressure of 100 psi) and an excellent total organic solute rejection rate (99.8%) without appreciable fouling. The increase in the concentration of surface-oxidized MWNT in the coating layer generally improves the flux rate, which can be attributed to the generation of more effective hydrophilic nanochannels for water passage in the composite membranes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dai, W. S., & Barbari, T. A. (1999) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/s0376-7388(98)00330-5 · Cited by 142
Cited by
Polymer-matrix nanocomposite membranes for water treatment
Yin, J., & Deng, B. (2015) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2014.11.019 · Cited by 1,089
Extraction of lithium with functionalized lithium ion-sieves
Xu, X., Chen, Y., Wan, P., Gasem, K., Wang, K., He, T., Adidharma, H., & Fan, M. (2016) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2016.09.004 · Cited by 536
Electrospun nanofibrous materials: a versatile medium for effective oil/water separation
Wang, X., Yu, J., Sun, G., & Ding, B. (2016) · Materials Today · doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2015.11.010 · Cited by 448
Self-citationApplications of electrospun nanofibers
Fang, J., Niu, H., Lin, T., & Wang, X. (2008) · Science Bulletin · doi:10.1007/s11434-008-0319-0 · Cited by 313
Self-citationRecycled PET Nanofibers for Water Filtration Applications
Zander, N., Gillan, M., & Sweetser, D. (2016) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma9040247 · Cited by 126
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, X., Chen, X., Yoon, K., Fang, D., Hsiao, B. S., & Chu, B.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-08-26
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 7684-7691
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2022974204
- Cited by
- 381
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.