The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sorption of Polar and Nonpolar Aromatic Organic Contaminants by Plant Cuticular Materials: Role of Polarity and Accessibility
Abstract
In both forest and agricultural soils, plant derived cuticular materials can constitute a significant part of soil organic matter. In this study, the sorption of nonpolar (naphthalene and phenanthrene) and polar (phenol and 1-naphthol) aromatic organic pollutants to aliphatic-rich cuticularfractions of green pepper (Capsicum annuum) (i.e., bulk (PC1), dewaxed (PC2), nonsaponifiable (PC3), nonsaponifiable-nonhydrolyzable (PC4), and dewaxed-hydrolyzed residue (PC5)) were examined to better understand the influence of polarity and accessibility on their sorption behavior. The polarity and structures of cuticular fractions were characterized by elemental analysis, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and solid-state 13C NMR. The sorption isotherms fit well to the Freundlich equation. Sorption of the tested organic compounds to PC4, which had more condensed domains, was nonlinear (Freundlich N(s) values of 0.766-0.966). For naphthalene and phenanthrene, the largest sorption capacity (K(oc)) occurred in PC5, which contained the highest paraffinic carbons (63%) and the lowest polarity: approximately 2 and aproximately 3 times higher than the respective carbon-normalized octanol-water partition coefficient (K(owc)), indicating that PC5 was a powerful sorption medium. For phenol and 1-naphthol, the largest K(oc) values occurred in PC4 with polar aromatic cores: approximattely 17 and approximately 7 times higher than the respective K(owc), suggesting that PC4 was much more accessible and compatible to polar aromatic pollutants than nonpolar aromatic pollutants. There was little or no correlation of K(oc) with either aliphatic or aromatic components of the tested aliphatic-rich sorbents because the polarity and accessibility apparently played a regulating role in the sorption of organic contaminants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Chen, B., Zhou, D., & Zhu, L. (2008) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es8002684 · Cited by 1,823
Self-citationEffect of pyrolysis temperature, heating rate, and residence time on rapeseed stem derived biochar
Zhao, B., O'Connor, D., Zhang, J., Peng, T., Shen, Z., Tsang, D. C. W., & Hou, D. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.013 · Cited by 843
Zhang, P., Sun, H., Yu, L., & Sun, T. (2013) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.11.046 · Cited by 420
Mechanism of negative surface charge formation on biochar and its effect on the fixation of soil Cd
Tan, Z., Yuan, S., Hong, M., Zhang, L., & Huang, Q. (2020) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121370 · Cited by 365
Fast and Slow Rates of Naphthalene Sorption to Biochars Produced at Different Temperatures
Chen, Z., Chen, B., & Chiou, C. T. (2012) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es302345e · Cited by 329
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, B., Johnson, E. J., Chefetz, B., Zhu, L., & Xing, B.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-07-14
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 6138-6146
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2069254242
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sorption of Polar and Nonpolar Aromatic Organic Contaminants by Plant Cuticular Materials: Role of Polarity and Accessibility. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es050622q
- The paper
- Chen, B., Johnson, E. J., Chefetz, B., Zhu, L., & Xing, B. (2005). Sorption of Polar and Nonpolar Aromatic Organic Contaminants by Plant Cuticular Materials: Role of Polarity and Accessibility. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es050622q
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.