The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Environmental Risks of Nanotechnology: National Nanotechnology Initiative Funding, 2000−2004
Abstract
By considering risk in the early stages of a technology, costs of identifying important health and environmental impacts after a technology has widely diffused can be avoided. Nanotechnology, involving materials and objects less than 100 nm in size, is an important case in point. In this paper we analyze the research priorities discussed by various interest groups concerned with the environmental risks of nanotechnology, evaluate the distribution of federal environmental nanotechnology R&D funding, and discuss research in this field. Overall federal environmental R&D funding to date is limited and focuses more on the positive environmental applications of nanotechnology than on basic knowledge/research, tools for nanoenvironmental research, or the potential risks of nanotechnology. The situation began to change in 2004 when a significant increase occurred in federal R&D funding for the environmental implications of engineered nanomaterials. Though literature exits on the exposure, transport, and toxicity of incidental nanoparticles, little work has been published on the environmental risks of engineered nanoparticles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On the Cyto‐Toxicity Caused by Quantum Dots
Shiohara, A., Hoshino, A., Hanaki, K., Suzuki, K., & Yamamoto, K. (2004) · Microbiology and Immunology · doi:10.1111/j.1348-0421.2004.tb03478.x · Cited by 385
Cited by
Environmental behavior and ecotoxicity of engineered nanoparticles to algae, plants, and fungi
Navarro, E., Baun, A., Behra, R., Hartmann, N. B., Filser, J., Miao, A.-J., Quigg, A., Santschi, P. H., & Sigg, L. (2008) · Ecotoxicology · doi:10.1007/s10646-008-0214-0 · Cited by 1,772
Nanotechnology in Cosmetics and Cosmeceuticals—A Review of Latest Advancements
Gupta, V., Mohapatra, S., Mishra, H., Farooq, U., Kumar, K., Ansari, M., Aldawsari, M., Alalaiwe, A., Mirza, M., & Iqbal, Z. (2022) · Gels · doi:10.3390/gels8030173 · Cited by 370
Kim, D., Kadam, A., Shinde, S., Saratale, R. G., Patra, J., & Ghodake, G. (2018) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.8749 · Cited by 312
Pourali, P., Badiee, S. H., Manafi, S., Noorani, T., Rezaei, A., & Yahyaei, B. (2017) · Electronic Journal of Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.ejbt.2017.07.005 · Cited by 120
Metadata
- Authors
- Dunphy Guzmán, K. A., Taylor, M. R., & Banfield, J. F.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-01-21
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1401-1407
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2058984075
- Cited by
- 355
- References
- 1
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Environmental Risks of Nanotechnology: National Nanotechnology Initiative Funding, 2000−2004. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es0515708
- The paper
- Dunphy Guzmán, K. A., Taylor, M. R., & Banfield, J. F. (2006). Environmental Risks of Nanotechnology: National Nanotechnology Initiative Funding, 2000−2004. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0515708
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
