The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improved Bioproduction of Short-Chain Fatty Acids (SCFAs) from Excess Sludge under Alkaline Conditions
Abstract
The production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) from excess sludge was conducted in batch fermentation tests at different pH values ranging from 4.0 to 11.0. Experimental results of the impacts of different pHs on SCFAs production showed that during the first 8-day fermentation time the total SCFAs production at either pH 9.0 or pH 10.0 was much greater than that at acidic or neutral pH, and the maximal yield of 256.2 mg SCFAs-COD per gram of volatile suspended solids (VSS) was at pH 10.0, which was, respectively, over3 and 4times that at pH 5.0 and uncontrolled pH. Clearly, SCFAs production from excess sludge could be significantly improved and maintained stable by controlling the fermentation pH at 10.0. The composition of SCFAs and the percent distribution of individual SCFAs accounting for total SCFAs at pH 10.0 were analyzed. The SCFAs consisted of acetic, propionic, iso-butyric, n-butyric, iso-valeric, and n-valeric acids, and acetic acid was the most prevalent product with a fraction of 40-55%. Because the results of this study were differentfrom those of previous studies of SCFAs production, the mechanism of increased SCFAs production under alkaline conditions was investigated. Results showed that as soluble COD increased, more soluble protein was provided as the substrate for producing SCFAs. In addition, less or even no SCFAs were consumed by methanogens at alkaline pH, so the SCFAs production was therefore remarkably improved. Further investigation revealed thatthe formation of SCFA at pH 10.0 was dominated by biological effects rather than by chemical hydrolysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
PROTEIN MEASUREMENT WITH THE FOLIN PHENOL REAGENT
Lowry, O., Rosebrough, N., Farr, A. L., & Randall, R. (1951) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(19)52451-6 · Cited by 317,331
Biology of anaerobic microorganisms
(1989) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.26-3877 · Cited by 2,252
Solubilization of particulate organic carbon during the acid phase of anaerobic digestion
Eastman, J. A., & Ferguson, J. F. (1981) · Cited by 565
Miron, Y. (2000) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/s0043-1354(99)00280-8 · Cited by 425
Enhanced Biohydrogen Production from Sewage Sludge with Alkaline Pretreatment
Cai, M., Liu, J., & Wei, Y. (2004) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es0349204 · Cited by 417
Goel, R., Mino, T., Satoh, H., et al. (1998) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/s0043-1354(97)00425-9 · Cited by 307
Effects of thermochemical pretreatment on the anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge
(1997) · Water Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/s0273-1223(97)00169-8 · Cited by 251
Use of volatile fatty acids from an acid-phase digester for denitrification
Elefsiniotis, P., Wareham, D. G., & Smith, M. (2004) · Journal of Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2004.02.016 · Cited by 249
Chen, Y., Randall, A. A., & McCue, T. (2003) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2003.08.025 · Cited by 242
Self-citationThe design and performance of a nitrifying vertical-flow reed bed treatment system
Cooper, P. F., Smith, M. A., & Maynard, H. (1997) · Water Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/s0273-1223(97)00071-1 · Cited by 79
Cited by
Enhancement of methane production in anaerobic digestion process: A review
Li, Y., Chen, Y., & Wu, J. (2019) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.243 · Cited by 874
Self-citationZhen, G., Lu, X., Kato, H., Zhao, Y., & Li, Y.-Y. (2017) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.187 · Cited by 868
Wang, K., Yin, J., Shen, D., & Li, N. (2014) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2014.03.088 · Cited by 607
Wainaina, S., Lukitawesa, Kumar Awasthi, M., & Taherzadeh, M. J. (2019) · Bioengineered · doi:10.1080/21655979.2019.1673937 · Cited by 555
RetractedHydrothermal carbonization for energy-efficient processing of sewage sludge: A review
Wang, L., Chang, Y., & Li, A. (2019) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.04.011 · Cited by 499
Mu, H., Chen, Y., & Xiao, N. (2011) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2011.08.100 · Cited by 268
Self-citationAnaerobic digestion of food waste for bio-energy production in China and Southeast Asia: A review
Negri, C., Ricci, M., Zilio, M., D'Imporzano, G., Qiao, W., Dong, R., & Adani, F. (2020) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.110138 · Cited by 223
Ma, H., Lin, Y., Jin, Y., Gao, M., Li, H., Wang, Q., Ge, S., Cai, L., Huang, Z., Van Le, Q., et al. (2021) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115936 · Cited by 85
Chen, Y., Liu, H., Zheng, X., Wang, X., & Wu, J. (2017) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.01.100 · Cited by 66
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Yuan, H., Chen, Y., Zhang, H., Jiang, S., Zhou, Q., & Gu, G.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-02-11
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2025-2029
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2066571281
- Cited by
- 560
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 32.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.