The DOI matches its Crossref record.
TiO2-Photocatalyzed As(III) Oxidation in a Fixed-Bed, Flow-Through Reactor
Open accessAbstract
Compliance with the U.S. drinking water standard for arsenic (As) of 10 microg L(-1) is required in January 2006. This will necessitate implementation of treatment technologies for As removal by thousands of water suppliers. Although a variety of such technologies is available, most require preoxidation of As(III) to As(V) for efficient performance. Previous batch studies with illuminated TiO2 slurries have demonstrated that TiO2-photocatalyzed AS(III) oxidation occurs rapidly. This study examined reaction efficiency in a flow-through, fixed-bed reactor that provides a better model for treatment in practice. Glass beads were coated with mixed P25/sol gel TiO2 and employed in an upflow reactor irradiated from above. The reactor residence time, influent As(III) concentration, number of TiO2 coatings on the beads, solution matrix, and light source were varied to characterize this reaction and determine its feasibility for water treatment. Repeated usage of the same beads in multiple experiments or extended use was found to affect effluent As(V) concentrations but not the steady-state effluent As(III) concentration, which suggests that As(III) oxidation at the TiO2 surface undergoes dynamic sorption equilibration. Catalyst poisoning was not observed either from As(V) or from competitively adsorbing anions, although the higher steady-state effluent As(III) concentrations in synthetic groundwater compared to 5 mM NaNO3 indicated that competitive sorbates in the matrix partially hinder the reaction. A reactive transport model with rate constants proportional to incident light at each bead layer fit the experimental data well despite simplifying assumptions. TiO2-photocatalyzed oxidation of As(III) was also effective under natural sunlight. Limitations to the efficiency of As(III) oxidation in the fixed-bed reactor were attributable to constraints of the reactor geometry, which could be overcome by improved design. The fixed-bed TiO2 reactor offers an environmentally benign method for As(III) oxidation.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, the initial As concentration, pH, natural organic matter (NOM), and the presence of anions essentially affected the rate of adsorption of As(V)on TiO2 [150, 153–155].”
From Arsenic Contamination of Groundwater: A Review of Sources, Prevalence, Health Risks, and Strategies for Mitigation (2014) · cites this paper as [150]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 31
- Smith A. H., 2002, Science, 296, 2146
- Hering J. G., 1996, J. Am. Water Works Assoc., 88, 167, 10.1002/j.1551-8833.1996.tb06541.x · DOI
- Hering J. G., 1997, J. Environ. Eng.-ASCE, 123, 807, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1997)123:8(800) · DOI
- McNeill L. S., 1997, J. Am. Water Works Assoc., 89, 86, 10.1002/j.1551-8833.1997.tb08163.x · DOI
- Hoffmann M. R., 1995, Chem. Rev., 95, 96, 10.1021/cr00033a004 · DOI · Paper page
- Bang S., 2005, Chemosphere, 60, 397, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.12.008 · DOI
- Yang H., 1999, J. Photochem. Photobiol., A, 123, 143, 10.1016/S1010-6030(99)00052-0 · DOI
- Bissen M., 2001, Chemosphere, 44, 757, 10.1016/S0045-6535(00)00489-6 · DOI
- Lee H., 2002, Environ. Sci. Technol., 36, 3878
- Ferguson M. A., 2005, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 1886, 10.1021/es048795n · DOI
- Jayaweera P. M., 2003, Curr. Sci., 84, 543
- Ryu J., 2004, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 2933
- Dutta P. K., 2005, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 1834, 10.1021/es0489238 · DOI
- Pena M. E., 2005, Water Res., 39, 2337
- Xu T., 2005, J. Phys. Chem. A, 109, 9075
- Serpone N., 1986, Sol. Energy Mater., 14, 127, 10.1016/0165-1633(86)90070-5 · DOI
- Balasubramanian G., 2004, Appl. Catal., B, 47, 84, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2003.04.002 · DOI
- Dijkstra M. F. J., 2001, Chem. Eng. Sci., 56, 555
- Alekabi H., 1988, J. Phys. Chem., 92, 5731, 10.1021/j100331a037 · DOI
- Wang K. H., 1998, Appl. Catal., B, 17, 320
- Fernandez A., 1995, Appl. Catal., B, 7, 63, 10.1016/0926-3373(95)00026-7 · DOI
- Matthews R. W, 1991, Water Res., 25, 1176, 10.1016/0043-1354(91)90054-T · DOI
- Peill N. J., 1996, Environ. Sci. Technol., 30, 2812, 10.1021/es960047d · DOI
- Burns R. A., 1999, J. Environ. Eng.-ASCE, 125, 85, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1999)125:1(77) · DOI
- Kim T. Y., 2005, Res. Chem. Intermed., 31, 358
- Balasubramanian G., 2003, J. Mater. Sci., 38, 831, 10.1023/A:1021869200589 · DOI
- Calvert J. G., 1966, Photochemistry, 789
- Hunt M. L., 1988, J. Heat Transfer-Transactions of the ASME, 110, 384
- 2003, Office of Water. Ultraviolet Disinfection Guidance Manual 815-D-03-007
- Langmuir D., 1997, Aqueous Environmental Geochemistry
- Williamson S., 2005, United States Geological Survey, 2003
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Shankar, S., Shanker, U., & Shikha (2014) · The Scientific World Journal · doi:10.1155/2014/304524 · Cited by 616
Balati, A., Wagle, D., Nash, K. L., & Shipley, H. J. (2019) · Applied Nanoscience · doi:10.1007/s13204-018-0902-x · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Ferguson, M. A., & Hering, J. G.
- Affiliations
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hering, Janet G.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-06-01
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 4261-4267
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2093390783
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 3.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- infoscience.epfl.ch
- Locations
- Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
- Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Arsenic contamination and mitigation
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Advanced oxidation water treatment
- Keywords
- arsenic removal, arsenite oxidation, TiO2 photocatalysis, drinking water treatment, upflow reactor, sol-gel TiO2, P25 TiO2, arsenate adsorption, competitive adsorption, catalyst poisoning, reactive transport modeling, solar irradiation, groundwater treatment
- MeSH terms
- Absorption, Adsorption, Arsenic, Models, Chemical, Oxidation-Reduction, Photochemistry, Titanium, United States, Water, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Water Purification, Bioreactors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review