Cited by 61Arsenic contamination and mitigationTiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar CellsAdvanced oxidation water treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

TiO2-Photocatalyzed As(III) Oxidation in a Fixed-Bed, Flow-Through Reactor

Open access
Ferguson, Megan A., Hering, Janet G.·2006·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

Compliance with the U.S. drinking water standard for arsenic (As) of 10 microg L(-1) is required in January 2006. This will necessitate implementation of treatment technologies for As removal by thousands of water suppliers. Although a variety of such technologies is available, most require preoxidation of As(III) to As(V) for efficient performance. Previous batch studies with illuminated TiO2 slurries have demonstrated that TiO2-photocatalyzed AS(III) oxidation occurs rapidly. This study examined reaction efficiency in a flow-through, fixed-bed reactor that provides a better model for treatment in practice. Glass beads were coated with mixed P25/sol gel TiO2 and employed in an upflow reactor irradiated from above. The reactor residence time, influent As(III) concentration, number of TiO2 coatings on the beads, solution matrix, and light source were varied to characterize this reaction and determine its feasibility for water treatment. Repeated usage of the same beads in multiple experiments or extended use was found to affect effluent As(V) concentrations but not the steady-state effluent As(III) concentration, which suggests that As(III) oxidation at the TiO2 surface undergoes dynamic sorption equilibration. Catalyst poisoning was not observed either from As(V) or from competitively adsorbing anions, although the higher steady-state effluent As(III) concentrations in synthetic groundwater compared to 5 mM NaNO3 indicated that competitive sorbates in the matrix partially hinder the reaction. A reactive transport model with rate constants proportional to incident light at each bead layer fit the experimental data well despite simplifying assumptions. TiO2-photocatalyzed oxidation of As(III) was also effective under natural sunlight. Limitations to the efficiency of As(III) oxidation in the fixed-bed reactor were attributable to constraints of the reactor geometry, which could be overcome by improved design. The fixed-bed TiO2 reactor offers an environmentally benign method for As(III) oxidation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es0524853

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Smith A. H., 2002, Science, 296, 2146
  2. Hering J. G., 1996, J. Am. Water Works Assoc., 88, 167, 10.1002/j.1551-8833.1996.tb06541.x · DOI
  3. Hering J. G., 1997, J. Environ. Eng.-ASCE, 123, 807, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1997)123:8(800) · DOI
  4. McNeill L. S., 1997, J. Am. Water Works Assoc., 89, 86, 10.1002/j.1551-8833.1997.tb08163.x · DOI
  5. Hoffmann M. R., 1995, Chem. Rev., 95, 96, 10.1021/cr00033a004 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Bang S., 2005, Chemosphere, 60, 397, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.12.008 · DOI
  7. Yang H., 1999, J. Photochem. Photobiol., A, 123, 143, 10.1016/S1010-6030(99)00052-0 · DOI
  8. Bissen M., 2001, Chemosphere, 44, 757, 10.1016/S0045-6535(00)00489-6 · DOI
  9. Lee H., 2002, Environ. Sci. Technol., 36, 3878
  10. Ferguson M. A., 2005, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 1886, 10.1021/es048795n · DOI
  11. Jayaweera P. M., 2003, Curr. Sci., 84, 543
  12. Ryu J., 2004, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 2933
  13. Dutta P. K., 2005, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 1834, 10.1021/es0489238 · DOI
  14. Pena M. E., 2005, Water Res., 39, 2337
  15. Xu T., 2005, J. Phys. Chem. A, 109, 9075
  16. Serpone N., 1986, Sol. Energy Mater., 14, 127, 10.1016/0165-1633(86)90070-5 · DOI
  17. Balasubramanian G., 2004, Appl. Catal., B, 47, 84, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2003.04.002 · DOI
  18. Dijkstra M. F. J., 2001, Chem. Eng. Sci., 56, 555
  19. Alekabi H., 1988, J. Phys. Chem., 92, 5731, 10.1021/j100331a037 · DOI
  20. Wang K. H., 1998, Appl. Catal., B, 17, 320
  21. Fernandez A., 1995, Appl. Catal., B, 7, 63, 10.1016/0926-3373(95)00026-7 · DOI
  22. Matthews R. W, 1991, Water Res., 25, 1176, 10.1016/0043-1354(91)90054-T · DOI
  23. Peill N. J., 1996, Environ. Sci. Technol., 30, 2812, 10.1021/es960047d · DOI
  24. Burns R. A., 1999, J. Environ. Eng.-ASCE, 125, 85, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1999)125:1(77) · DOI
  25. Kim T. Y., 2005, Res. Chem. Intermed., 31, 358
  26. Balasubramanian G., 2003, J. Mater. Sci., 38, 831, 10.1023/A:1021869200589 · DOI
  27. Calvert J. G., 1966, Photochemistry, 789
  28. Hunt M. L., 1988, J. Heat Transfer-Transactions of the ASME, 110, 384
  29. 2003, Office of Water. Ultraviolet Disinfection Guidance Manual 815-D-03-007
  30. Langmuir D., 1997, Aqueous Environmental Geochemistry
  31. Williamson S., 2005, United States Geological Survey, 2003

Metadata

Authors
Ferguson, M. A., & Hering, J. G.
Affiliations
California Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Hering, Janet G.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2006-06-01
Volume
40
Issue
13
Pages
4261-4267
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2093390783
Cited by
61
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Arsenic contamination and mitigation
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Advanced oxidation water treatment
Keywords
arsenic removal, arsenite oxidation, TiO2 photocatalysis, drinking water treatment, upflow reactor, sol-gel TiO2, P25 TiO2, arsenate adsorption, competitive adsorption, catalyst poisoning, reactive transport modeling, solar irradiation, groundwater treatment
MeSH terms
Absorption, Adsorption, Arsenic, Models, Chemical, Oxidation-Reduction, Photochemistry, Titanium, United States, Water, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Water Purification, Bioreactors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review