The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparative Ecotoxicological Hazard Assessment of Beta-Blockers and Their Human Metabolites Using a Mode-of-Action-Based Test Battery and a QSAR Approach
Abstract
We analyzed nontarget effects of the beta-blockers propranolol, metoprolol, and atenolol with a screening test battery encompassing nonspecific, receptor-mediated, and reactive modes of toxic action. All beta-blockers were baseline toxicants and showed no specific effects on energy transduction nor endocrine activity in the yeast estrogen and androgen screen, and no reactive toxicity toward proteins and DNA. However, in a phytotoxicity assay based on the inhibition of the photosynthesis efficiency in green algae, all beta-blockers were 10 times more toxic than their modeled baseline toxicity. Baseline- and phytotoxicity effects increased with hydrophobicity. The beta-blockers showed concentration addition in mixture experiments, indicating a mutual specific nontarget effect on algae. Using literature data and quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR), we modeled the total toxic potential of mixtures of the beta-blockers and their associated human metabolites for the phytotoxicity endpoint with two scenarios. The realistic scenario (I) assumes that the metabolites lose their specific activity and act as baseline toxicants. In the worst-case scenario (II) the metabolites exhibitthe same specific mode of action as their parent drug. For scenario (II), metabolism hardly affected the overall toxicity of atenolol and metoprolol, whereas propranolol's hazard potential decreased significantly. In scenario (I), metabolism reduced the apparent EC50 of the mixture of parent drug and metabolite even further. The proposed method is a simple approach to initial hazard assessment of pharmaceuticals and can guide higher tier testing. It can be applied to other classes of pollutants, e.g., biocides, as well as to environmental transformation products of pollutants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Removal of pharmaceuticals from water by homo/heterogonous Fenton-type processes – A review
Mirzaei, A., Chen, Z., Haghighat, F., & Yerushalmi, L. (2017) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.02.019 · Cited by 600
Environmental toxicology and risk assessment of pharmaceuticals from hospital wastewater
Escher, B. I., Baumgartner, R., Koller, M., Treyer, K., Lienert, J., & McArdell, C. S. (2011) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2010.08.019 · Cited by 531
Self-citationDegradation of Pharmaceuticals and Metabolite in Synthetic Human Urine by UV, UV/H2O2, and UV/PDS
Zhang, R., Sun, P., Boyer, T. H., Zhao, L., & Huang, C.-H. (2015) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es504799n · Cited by 506
Recent Advances in Environmental Risk Assessment of Transformation Products
Escher, B. I., & Fenner, K. (2011) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es1030799 · Cited by 501
Self-citationLienert, J., Güdel, K., & Escher, B. I. (2007) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es0627693 · Cited by 329
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Escher, B. I., Bramaz, N., Richter, M., & Lienert, J.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-06-21
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 7402-7408
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2076971009
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative Ecotoxicological Hazard Assessment of Beta-Blockers and Their Human Metabolites Using a Mode-of-Action-Based Test Battery and a QSAR Approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es052572v
- The paper
- Escher, B. I., Bramaz, N., Richter, M., & Lienert, J. (2006). Comparative Ecotoxicological Hazard Assessment of Beta-Blockers and Their Human Metabolites Using a Mode-of-Action-Based Test Battery and a QSAR Approach. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es052572v
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.