The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Challenges and Constraints of Using Oxygen Cathodes in Microbial Fuel Cells
Abstract
The performance of oxygen reduction catalysts (platinum, pyrolyzed iron(ll) phthalocyanine (pyr-FePc) and cobalt tetramethoxyphenylporphyrin (pyr-CoTMPP)) is discussed in light of their application in microbial fuel cells. It is demonstrated that the physical and chemical environment in microbial fuel cells severely affects the thermodynamics and the kinetics of the electrocatalytic oxygen reduction. The neutral pH in combination with low buffer capacities and low ionic concentrations strongly affect the cathode performance and limit the fuel cell power output. Thus, the limiting current density in galvanodyanamic polarization experiments decreases from 1.5 mA cm(-2) to 0.6 mA cm(-2) (pH 3.3, E(cathode) = 0 V) when the buffer concentration is decreased from 500 to 50 mM. The cathode limitations are superposed by the increasing internal resistance of the MFC that substantially contributes to the decrease of power output. For example, the maximum power output of a model MFC decreased by 35%, from 2.3 to 1.5 mW, whereas the difference between the electrode potentials (deltaE = E(anode) - E(cathode)) decreased only by 10%. The increase of the catalyst load of pyr-FePc from 0.25 to 2 mg cm(-2) increased the cathodic current density from 0.4 to 0.97 mA cm(-2) (pH 7, 50 mM phosphate buffer). The increase of the load of such inexpensive catalyst thus represents a suitable means to improve the cathode performance in microbial fuel cells. Due to the low concentration of protons in MFCs in comparison to relatively high alkali cation levels (ratio C(Na+,K+)/C(H+) = 5 x E5 in pH 7, 50 mM phosphate buffer) the transfer of alkali ions through the proton exchange membrane plays a major role in the charge-balancing ion flux from the anodic into the cathodic compartment. This leads to the formation of pH gradients between the anode and the cathode compartment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cathodic limitations in microbial fuel cells: An overview
Rismani-Yazdi, H., Carver, S. M., Christy, A. D., & Tuovinen, O. H. (2008) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.02.074 · Cited by 734
Lee, J., Kim, K.-H., & Kwon, E. E. (2017) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.002 · Cited by 668
ter Heijne, A., Hamelers, H. V. M., de Wilde, V., Rozendal, R. A., & Buisman, C. J. N. (2006) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es0608545 · Cited by 309
Cathodic oxygen reduction catalyzed by bacteria in microbial fuel cells
Rabaey, K., Read, S. T., Clauwaert, P., Freguia, S., Bond, P. L., Blackall, L. L., & Keller, J. (2008) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2008.1 · Cited by 300
A Role for Microbial Palladium Nanoparticles in Extracellular Electron Transfer
Wu, X., Zhao, F., Rahunen, N., Varcoe, J. R., Avignone‐Rossa, C., Thumser, A. E., & Slade, R. C. T. (2011) · Angewandte Chemie · doi:10.1002/ange.201002951 · Cited by 21
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, F., Harnisch, F., Schröder, U., Scholz, F., Bogdanoff, P., & Herrmann, I.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-05-25
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 5193-5199
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2042934951
- Cited by
- 539
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 32.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Challenges and Constraints of Using Oxygen Cathodes in Microbial Fuel Cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es060332p
- The paper
- Zhao, F., Harnisch, F., Schröder, U., Scholz, F., Bogdanoff, P., & Herrmann, I. (2006). Challenges and Constraints of Using Oxygen Cathodes in Microbial Fuel Cells. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es060332p
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.