The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of Particle Age (Fe0 Content) and Solution pH On NZVI Reactivity: H2 Evolution and TCE Dechlorination
Abstract
Subsurface injection of nanoscale zerovalent iron (NZVI) has been used for the in situ remediation of chlorinated solvent plumes and DNAPL source zones. Due to the cost of materials and placement,the efficacy of this approach depends on the NZVI reactivity and longevity, selectivity for the target contaminant relative to nonspecific corrosion to yield H2, and access to the Fe0 in the particles. Both the reaction pH and the age of the particles (i.e., Fe0 content) could affect NZVI reactivity and longevity. Here, the rates of H2 evolution and trichloroethene (TCE) reduction are measured over the lifetime of the particles and at solution pH ranging from 6.5 to 8.9. Crystalline reactive nanoscale iron particles (RNIP) with different initial Fe0 weight percent (48%, 36%, 34%, 27%, and 9.6%) but similar specific surface area were studied. At the equilibrium pH for a Fe(OH)2/H2O system (pH = 8.9), RNIP exhibited first-order decay for Fe0 corrosion (H2 evolution) with respect to Fe0 content with a Fe0 half-life time of 90-180 days. A stable surface area-normalized TCE reduction rate constant 1.0 x 10(-3)L x hr(-1) x m(-2) was observed after 20 days and remained constant for 160 days, while the Fe0 content of the particles decreased by half, suggesting that TCE reduction is zero-order with respect to the Fe0 content of the particle. Solution pH affected H2 evolution and TCE reduction to a different extent. Decreasing pH from 8.9 to 6.5 increased the H2 evolution rate constant 27 fold from 0.008 to 0.22 day(-1), but the TCE dechlorination rate constant only doubled. The dissimilarities between the reaction orders of H2 evolution and TCE dechlorination with respect to both Fe0 content and H+ concentration suggest that different rate controlling steps are involved for the reduction reactions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nanoscale iron particles for environmental remediation: An overview
Zhang, W.-X. (2003) · Journal of Nanoparticle Research · doi:10.1023/a:1025520116015 · Cited by 2,003
Cited by
Nanoscale zero-valent iron: Future prospects for an emerging water treatment technology
Crane, R. A., & Scott, T. B. (2012) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.11.073 · Cited by 1,154
Nanoscale zero valent iron and bimetallic particles for contaminated site remediation
O’Carroll, D., Sleep, B., Krol, M., Boparai, H., & Kocur, C. (2013) · Advances in Water Resources · doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.02.005 · Cited by 872
Huang, B., Lei, C., Wei, C., & Zeng, G. (2014) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2014.06.013 · Cited by 839
Advances in Surface Passivation of Nanoscale Zerovalent Iron: A Critical Review
Bae, S., Collins, R. N., Waite, T. D., & Hanna, K. (2018) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.8b01734 · Cited by 435
Heavy metal removal using nanoscale zero-valent iron (nZVI): Theory and application
Li, S., Wang, W., Liang, F., & Zhang, W.-X. (2017) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.01.032 · Cited by 431
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, Y., & Lowry, G. V.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-08-30
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 6085-6090
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2339127807
- Cited by
- 471
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.