Cited by 751Water Treatment and DisinfectionCarcinogens and Genotoxicity AssessmentEnvironmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology

Haloacetonitriles vs. Regulated Haloacetic Acids: Are Nitrogen-Containing DBPs More Toxic?

Muellner, Mark G., Wagner, Elizabeth D., McCalla, Kristin, Richardson, Susan D., Woo, Yin-Tak, Plewa, Michael J.·2007·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

Haloacetonitriles (HANs) are toxic nitrogenous drinking water disinfection byproducts (N-DBPs) and are observed with chlorine, chloramine, or chlorine dioxide disinfection. Using microplate-based Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell assays for chronic cytotoxicity and acute genotoxicity, we analyzed 7 HANs: iodoacetonitrile (IAN), bromoacetonitrile (BAN), dibromoacetonitrile (DBAN), bromochloroacetonitrile (BCAN), chloroacetonitrile (CAN), dichloroacetonitrile (DCAN), and trichloroacetonitrile (TCAN). The cytotoxic potency (%C1/2 values) ranged from 2.8 microM (DBAN) to 0.16 mM (TCAN), with a descending rank order of DBAN > IAN approximately BAN > BCAN > DCAN > CAN > TCAN. HANs induced acute genomic DNA damage; the single cell gel electrophoresis (SCGE) genotoxicity potency ranged from 37 microM (IAN) to 2.7 mM (DCAN). The rank order of declining genotoxicity was IAN > BAN approximately DBAN > BCAN > CAN > TCAN > DCAN. The accompanying structure-activity analysis of these HANs was in general agreement with the genotoxicity rank order. These data were incorporated into our growing quantitative comparative DBP cytotoxicity and genotoxicity databases. As a chemical class, the HANs are more toxic than regulated carbon-based DBPs, such as the haloacetic acids. The toxicity of N-DBPs may become a health concern because of the increased use of alternative disinfectants, such as chloramines, which may enhance the formation of N-DBPs, including HANs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es0617441

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Muellner, M. G., Wagner, E. D., McCalla, K., Richardson, S. D., Woo, Y.-T., & Plewa, M. J.
Affiliations
Environmental Protection Agency (US)
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2006-12-06
Volume
41
Issue
2
Pages
645-651
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2062929894
Cited by
751
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 21
FWCI
10.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Water Treatment and Disinfection
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
Keywords
haloacetonitriles, drinking water disinfection by-products, haloacetic acids, cytotoxicity, genotoxicity, dibromoacetonitrile, trichloroacetonitrile, chloramines, chlorine disinfection, structure-activity relationship, comet assay, alternative disinfectants
MeSH terms
Acetates, Acetonitriles, Animals, Cell Count, Cricetulus, Disinfection, Electrophoresis, Cricetinae, Hydrocarbons, Halogenated, Mutagenicity Tests, Regression Analysis, Water Supply, CHO Cells, Water Purification, Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Cell Proliferation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review