The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effect of a Fullerene Water Suspension on Bacterial Phospholipids and Membrane Phase Behavior
Abstract
Several fullerene-based nanomaterials generate reactive oxygen species that can damage cells. In this study, we investigated the effect of buckminsterfullerene (C60) introduced as colloidal aggregates in water (nC60) on bacterial membrane lipid composition and phase behavior. Pseudomonas putida (Gram-negative) and Bacillus subtilis (Gram-positive) responded to nC60 by altering membrane lipid composition, phase transition temperature, and membrane fluidity. P. putida decreased its levels of unsaturated fatty acids and increased the proportions of cyclopropane fatty acids in the presence of nC60, possibly to protect the bacterial membrane from oxidative stress. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy measurement of intact bacterial cells showed slightly increased phase transition temperatures (Tm) and increased membrane fluidity for cells grown in the presence of high, growth-inhibiting concentrations (0.5 mg L(-1)) of nC60. B. subtilis responded to a low dose of nC6o (0.01 mg L(-1)) by significantly increasing the levels of iso- and anteiso-branched fatty acids (from 5.8 to 31.5% and 12.9 to 32.3% of total fatty acids, respectively) and to a high, growth-inhibiting concentration of nC60 (0.75 mg L-1) by increasing synthesis of monounsaturated fatty acids. In contrast to P. putida, B. subtilis response was a decrease in Tm and an increase in membrane fluidity. These findings represent the first demonstrated physiological adaptation response of bacteria to a manufactured nanomaterial, and they showthat response inlipid composition and membrane phase behavior depends on both the nC60 concentration and the cell wall morphology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Antibacterial properties of nanoparticles
Hajipour, M. J., Fromm, K. M., Akbar Ashkarran, A., Jimenez de Aberasturi, D., Larramendi, I. R. D., Rojo, T., Serpooshan, V., Parak, W. J., & Mahmoudi, M. (2012) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.06.004 · Cited by 2,710
Li, Q., Mahendra, S., Lyon, D. Y., Brunet, L., Liga, M. V., Li, D., & Alvarez, P. J. J. (2008) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2008.08.015 · Cited by 2,385
Self-citationFarré, M. L., Pérez, S., Kantiani, L., & Barceló, D. (2008) · TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.trac.2008.09.010 · Cited by 1,009
Lee, J., Mahendra, S., & Alvarez, P. J. J. (2010) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn100866w · Cited by 750
Self-citationYousefi, M., Dadashpour, M., Hejazi, M., Hasanzadeh, M., Behnam, B., de la Guardia, M., Shadjou, N., & Mokhtarzadeh, A. (2017) · Materials Science and Engineering: C · doi:10.1016/j.msec.2016.12.125 · Cited by 258
Adaptation of Rhodococcus to organic solvents
de Carvalho, C. C. C. R. (2019) · Microbiology Monographs · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-11461-9_5 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Fang, J., Lyon, D. Y., Wiesner, M. R., Dong, J., & Alvarez
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-02-22
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2636-2642
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2091485179
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.