The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Removal Mechanism of As(III) by a Novel Fe−Mn Binary Oxide Adsorbent: Oxidation and Sorption
Abstract
A novel Fe-Mn binary oxide adsorbent was developed for effective As(III) removal, which is more difficult to remove from drinking water and much more toxic to humans than As(V). The synthetic adsorbent showed a significantly higher As(III) uptake than As(V). The mechanism study is therefore necessary for interpreting such result and understanding the As(III) removal process. A control experiment was conducted to investigate the effect of Na2SO3-treatment on arsenic removal, which can provide useful information on As(III) removal mechanism. The adsorbent was first treated by Na2SO3, which can lower its oxidizing capacity by reductive dissolution of the Mn oxide and then reacted with As(V) or As(III). The results showed that the As(V) uptake was enhanced while the As(III) removal was inhibited after the pretreatment, indicating the important role of manganese dioxide during the As(III) removal. FTIR along with XPS was used to analyze the surface change of the original Fe-Mn adsorbent and the pretreated adsorbent before and after reaction with As(V) or As(III). Change in characteristic surface hydroxyl groups (Fe-OH, 1130, 1048, and 973 cm(-1)) was observed by the FTIR. The determination of arsenic oxidation state on the solid surface after reaction with As(III) revealed that the manganese dioxide instead of the iron oxide oxidized As(III) to As(V). The iron oxide was dominant for adsorbing the formed As(V). An oxidation and sorption mechanism for As(III) removal was developed. The relatively higher As(III) uptake may be attributed to the formation of fresh adsorption sites at the solid surface during As(III) oxidation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dixit, S., & Hering, J. G. (2003) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es030309t · Cited by 2,407
Arsenic toxicity and potential mechanisms of action
Hughes, M. F. (2002) · Toxicology Letters · doi:10.1016/s0378-4274(02)00084-x · Cited by 1,671
Arsenite and Arsenate Adsorption on Ferrihydrite: Kinetics, Equilibrium, and Adsorption Envelopes
Raven, K. P., Jain, A., & Loeppert, R. H. (1998) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es970421p · Cited by 1,440
Goldberg, S., & Johnston, C. T. (2001) · Journal of Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1006/jcis.2000.7295 · Cited by 1,264
Waychunas, G. A., Rea, B. A., Fuller, C. C., & Davis, J. A. (1993) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/0016-7037(93)90567-g · Cited by 1,149
Adsorption of arsenite and arsenate on amorphous iron hydroxide
Pierce, M. L., & Moore, C. B. (1982) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/0043-1354(82)90143-9 · Cited by 1,110
A review of the arsenic cycle in natural waters
Ferguson, J. F., & Gavis, J. (1972) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/0043-1354(72)90052-8 · Cited by 1,013
Preparation and evaluation of a novel Fe–Mn binary oxide adsorbent for effective arsenite removal
Zhang, G., Qu, J., Liu, H., Liu, R., & Wu, R. (2007) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2007.02.009 · Cited by 612
Self-citationArsenate Adsorption on an Fe−Ce Bimetal Oxide Adsorbent: Role of Surface Properties
Zhang, Y., Yang, M., Dou, X.-M., He, H., & Wang, D.-S. (2005) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es050775d · Cited by 548
Reactions at Oxide Surfaces. 1. Oxidation of As(III) by Synthetic Birnessite
Scott, M. J., & Morgan, J. J. (1995) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es00008a006 · Cited by 327
Oscarson, D. W., Huang, P. M., Defosse, C., & Herbillon, A. (1981) · Nature · doi:10.1038/291050a0 · Cited by 324
Nesbitt, H. W., Canning, G. W., & Bancroft, G. M. (1998) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/s0016-7037(98)00146-x · Cited by 299
Removal of As(III) and As(V) from water using a natural Fe and Mn enriched sample
Deschamps, E., Ciminelli, V. S. T., & Höll, W. H. (2005) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2005.10.007 · Cited by 190
Ding, M., de Jong, B. H. W. S., Roosendaal, S. J., & Vredenberg, A. (2000) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/s0016-7037(99)00386-5 · Cited by 179
Ouvrard, S., de Donato, P., Simonnot, M., Bégin‐Colin, S., Ghanbaja, J., Alnot, M., Duval, Y. B., Lhote, F., Barrès, O., & Sardin, M. (2005) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.gca.2004.12.023 · Cited by 110
Reaction Scheme for the Oxidation of as(III) to as(V) by Birnessite
Moore, J. N., Walker, J. R., & Hayes, T. H. (1990) · Clays and Clay Minerals · doi:10.1346/ccmn.1990.0380512 · Cited by 110
Cited by
Metal-organic frameworks: Challenges and opportunities for ion-exchange/sorption applications
Kumar, P., Pournara, A., Kim, K.-H., Bansal, V., Rapti, S., & Manos, M. J. (2017) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.01.002 · Cited by 423
Iron and aluminium based adsorption strategies for removing arsenic from water
Giles, D. E., Mohapatra, M., Issa, T. B., Anand, S., & Singh, P. (2011) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.07.018 · Cited by 345
The mechanism of antimony(III) removal and its reactions on the surfaces of Fe–Mn Binary Oxide
Xu, W., Wang, H., Liu, R., Zhao, X., & Qu, J. (2011) · Journal of Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2011.07.026 · Cited by 274
Self-citationZhang, T., & Sun, D. D. (2013) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2013.04.001 · Cited by 91
Sarı, A., Saleh, T. A., & Tuzen, M. (2021) · Surfaces and Interfaces · doi:10.1016/j.surfin.2021.101504 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, G.-S., Qu, J.-H., Liu, H.-J., Liu, R.-P., & Li, G.-T.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-05-26
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 4613-4619
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2025367111
- Cited by
- 488
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 10.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
