The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ecological Knowledge is Lost in Wealthier Communities and Countries
Abstract
Accumulated knowledge about nature is an important part of people's capacityto manage and conserve the environment. But this ecological knowledge is now being increasingly lost. There have been few cross-cultural and quantitative studies to describe the phenomenon of its loss. Here we show a strong inverse correlation between ecological knowledge and income levels in and among India, Indonesia, and the U.K. (n=1095 interviews). Knowledge acquisition and subsequent saturation occurs at an early age in the most resource-dependent communities, but not in the U.K., where knowledge levels are low and acquisition is slow. Knowledge variance within communities increases in association with ecological knowledge decline and a scale of progressive knowledge loss was revealed with the most rapid rates of loss in industrialized regions. Various studies have described the mutually exclusive relationship between economic growth and environmental conservation; however this is the first to consider the association between economic growth and social capacity to manage the environment. Understanding ecological knowledge loss is importantto understanding the declining capacities of communities undergoing economic development to manage their natural resources and the future of ecosystem diversity in the light of current patterns of economic growth.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital
Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., et al. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/387253a0 · Cited by 22,585
Cited by
Dallimer, M., Irvine, K. N., Skinner, A. M. J., Davies, Z. G., Rouquette, J. R., Maltby, L. L., Warren, P. H., Armsworth, P. R., & Gaston, K. J. (2012) · BioScience · doi:10.1525/bio.2012.62.1.9 · Cited by 783
Shifting baseline syndrome: causes, consequences, and implications
Soga, M., & Gaston, K. J. (2018) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1002/fee.1794 · Cited by 709
Chivenge, P., Mabhaudhi, T., Modi, A., & Mafongoya, P. (2015) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph120605685 · Cited by 548
Lindemann-Matthies, P., Junge, X., & Matthies, D. (2010) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2009.10.003 · Cited by 361
Exploring perceived well-being from urban parks: insights from a megacity in Latin America
Parra-Saldívar, A., Abades, S., Celis-Diez, J. L., & Gelcich, S. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12187586 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Pilgrim, S. E., Cullen, L. C., Smith, D. J., & Pretty, J.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-01-08
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1004-1009
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2025627261
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 1
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ecological Knowledge is Lost in Wealthier Communities and Countries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es070837v
- The paper
- Pilgrim, S. E., Cullen, L. C., Smith, D. J., & Pretty, J. (2008). Ecological Knowledge is Lost in Wealthier Communities and Countries. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es070837v
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.