The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dust from U.K. Primary School Classrooms and Daycare Centers: The Significance of Dust As a Pathway of Exposure of Young U.K. Children to Brominated Flame Retardants and Polychlorinated Biphenyls
Abstract
Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), hexabromocyclododecanes (HBCDs), tetrabromobisphenol-A (TBBP-A), and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) were measured in floor dust from U.K. child daycare center and primary school classrooms (n = 43, 36 for PCBs). Concentrations of HBCDs exceeded significantly (p < 0.05) those reported previously for U.K. houses and offices, while those of TBBP-A exceeded significantly those in U.K. cars and offices. PCB concentrations were statistically indistinguishable from those in U.K. house dust but lower than in U.S. classroom dust, while BDEs 47, 99, 100, 153, 196, 197, 203, and 209 in classrooms were significantly below concentrations in U.K. cars. Exposure of young U.K. children via classroom dust exceeds that of U.K. adults via office dust for all contaminants monitored. Overall dust exposure of young U.K. children was estimated including car, classroom, and house dust. Exposure to TBBP-A was well below a U.K. health-based limit value (HBLV). Though no HBLVs exist for non-dioxin-like PCBs and HBCDs; dust exposure to PCBs fell well below U.K. dietary and inhalation exposure. Contrastingly, a high-end estimate of HBCD dust exposure exceeded U.K. dietary exposure substantially. Moreover, high-end estimates of dust exposure to BDE-99 and BDE-209 (4.3 and 13000 ng/kg bw/day, respectively) exceeded HBLVs of 0.23-0.30 and 7000 ng/kg bw/day respectively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Yang, D., Kim, K. H., Phimister, A., Bachstetter, A. D., Ward, T. R., Stackman, R. W., Mervis, R. F., Wisniewski, A. B., Klein, S. L., Kodavanti, P. R. S., et al. (2009) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.11771 · Cited by 166
Cited by
A review of status of tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA) in China
Liu, K., Li, J., Yan, S., Zhang, W., Li, Y., & Han, D. (2016) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.01.023 · Cited by 316
Marvin, C. H., Tomy, G. T., Armitage, J. M., Arnot, J. A., McCarty, L., Covaci, A., & Palace, V. (2011) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es201548c · Cited by 313
Self-citationMontano, L., Pironti, C., Pinto, G., Ricciardi, M., Buono, A., Brogna, C., Venier, M., Piscopo, M., Amoresano, A., & Motta, O. (2022) · Toxics · doi:10.3390/toxics10070365 · Cited by 268
Hall, S. M., Patton, S., Petreas, M., Zhang, S., Phillips, A. L., Hoffman, K., & Stapleton, H. M. (2020) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.0c04869 · Cited by 125
Metadata
- Authors
- Harrad, S., Goosey, E., Desborough, J., Abdallah, M. A.-E., Roosens, L., & Covaci, A.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-05-04
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 4198-4202
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2058971325
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
