The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An Improved Method for Estimating in Situ Sampling Rates of Nonpolar Passive Samplers
Abstract
The quality of passive sampling methods for measuring concentrations of dissolved hydrophobic contaminants relies on accurate knowledge of in situ sampling rates. In currently used methods for estimating these sampling rates from the dissipation rates of performance reference compounds (PRCs), the PRCs that show either insignificant or complete dissipation are ignored. We explored the merits of nonlinear least-squares (NLS) methods for estimating sampling rates, aiming to retain the information stored in PRC data that is neglected in the traditional methods. To this end, we examined the error structure of weighted NLS, unweighted NLS, and the traditional methods, using model simulations. The results show that sampling rates are best estimated using unweighted NLS. Uncertainties in the sampler-water partition coefficients may result in biased estimates that only weakly depend on the number of PRCs being used. The major advantage of unweighted NLS over the traditional method is that sampling rate estimates and uncertainties are available where the traditional method fails, and that the variability of sampling rate estimates is smaller.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Silicone Wristbands as Personal Passive Samplers
O’Connell, S. G., Kincl, L. D., & Anderson, K. A. (2014) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es405022f · Cited by 276
Deutsch, K., Leroy, D., Belpaire, C., den Haan, K. H., Vrana, B., Clayton, H., Hanke, G., Ricci, M., Held, A., Gawlik, B. M., et al. (2014) · DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) · doi:10.2779/833200 · Cited by 269
Khairy, M., Muir, D., Teixeira, C., & Lohmann, R. (2015) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b00186 · Cited by 56
Metadata
- Authors
- Booij, K., & Smedes, F.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-08-11
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 6789-6794
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2071166826
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.