Cited by 184Arsenic contamination and mitigationEnvironmental remediation with nanomaterialsCoal and Its By-products

Influence of Natural Organic Matter on As Transport and Retention

Sharma, Prasesh, Rolle, Massimo, Kocar, Benjamin, Fendorf, Scott, Kappler, Andreas·2011·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

Natural organic matter (NOM) can affect the behavior of arsenic within surface and subsurface environments. We used batch and column experiments to determine the effect of peat humic acids (PHA), groundwater fulvic acids (GFA), and a soil organic matter (SOM) extract on As sorption/transport in ferrihydrite-coated sand columns. A reactive transport model was used to quantitatively interpret the transport of As in flow-through column (breakthrough) experiments. We found that As(III) breakthrough was faster than As(V) by up to 18% (with OM) and 14% (without OM). The most rapid breakthrough occurred in systems containing SOM and GFA. Dialysis and ultrafiltration of samples from breakthrough experiments showed that in OM-containing systems, As was transported mostly as free (noncomplexed) dissolved As but also as ternary As-Fe-OM colloids and dissolved complexes. In OM-free systems, As was transported in colloidal form or as a free ion. During desorption, more As(III) desorbed (23-37%) than As(V) (10-16%), and SOM resulted in the highest and OM-free systems the lowest amount of desorption. Overall, our experiments reveal that (i) NOM can enhance transport/mobilization of As, (ii) different fractions of NOM are capable of As mobilization, and (iii) freshly extracted SOM (from a forest soil) had greater impact on As transport than purified GFA/PHA.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es1026008

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • According to Sharma et al. and Mitsunobu et al., a similar mechanism with much greater affinity to organic matter could be expected with Sb.

    “According to Sharma et al. [16, 17] and Mitsunobu et al. [18], a similar mechanism with much greater affinity to organic matter could be expected with Sb [19].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 184

Authors
Sharma, P., Rolle, M., Kocar, B., Fendorf, S., & Kappler, A.
Affiliations
University of Tübingen (DE)
Corresponding author
Kappler, Andreas
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2010-12-13
Volume
45
Issue
2
Pages
546-553
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2336406369
Cited by
184
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Arsenic contamination and mitigation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Coal and Its By-products
Keywords
natural organic matter, arsenic transport, arsenic retention, arsenic sorption, fulvic acid, humic acid, soil organic matter, ferrihydrite, reactive transport modeling, breakthrough experiments, arsenic desorption, groundwater contamination
MeSH terms
Adsorption, Arsenic, Benzopyrans, Ferric Compounds, Fresh Water, Kinetics, Models, Chemical, Silicon Dioxide, Soil, Soil Pollutants, Ultrafiltration, Water Movements, Water Pollutants, Chemical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review