Influence of Natural Organic Matter on As Transport and Retention
Abstract
Natural organic matter (NOM) can affect the behavior of arsenic within surface and subsurface environments. We used batch and column experiments to determine the effect of peat humic acids (PHA), groundwater fulvic acids (GFA), and a soil organic matter (SOM) extract on As sorption/transport in ferrihydrite-coated sand columns. A reactive transport model was used to quantitatively interpret the transport of As in flow-through column (breakthrough) experiments. We found that As(III) breakthrough was faster than As(V) by up to 18% (with OM) and 14% (without OM). The most rapid breakthrough occurred in systems containing SOM and GFA. Dialysis and ultrafiltration of samples from breakthrough experiments showed that in OM-containing systems, As was transported mostly as free (noncomplexed) dissolved As but also as ternary As-Fe-OM colloids and dissolved complexes. In OM-free systems, As was transported in colloidal form or as a free ion. During desorption, more As(III) desorbed (23-37%) than As(V) (10-16%), and SOM resulted in the highest and OM-free systems the lowest amount of desorption. Overall, our experiments reveal that (i) NOM can enhance transport/mobilization of As, (ii) different fractions of NOM are capable of As mobilization, and (iii) freshly extracted SOM (from a forest soil) had greater impact on As transport than purified GFA/PHA.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
According to Sharma et al. and Mitsunobu et al., a similar mechanism with much greater affinity to organic matter could be expected with Sb.
“According to Sharma et al. [16, 17] and Mitsunobu et al. [18], a similar mechanism with much greater affinity to organic matter could be expected with Sb [19].”
From Chemical Processes Affecting the Mobility of Heavy Metals and Metalloids in Soil Environments (2016) · cites this paper as [17]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 40 · Cited by 184
- Authors
- Sharma, P., Rolle, M., Kocar, B., Fendorf, S., & Kappler, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Tübingen (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Kappler, Andreas
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-12-13
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 546-553
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2336406369
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 5.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Arsenic contamination and mitigation
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Coal and Its By-products
- Keywords
- natural organic matter, arsenic transport, arsenic retention, arsenic sorption, fulvic acid, humic acid, soil organic matter, ferrihydrite, reactive transport modeling, breakthrough experiments, arsenic desorption, groundwater contamination
- MeSH terms
- Adsorption, Arsenic, Benzopyrans, Ferric Compounds, Fresh Water, Kinetics, Models, Chemical, Silicon Dioxide, Soil, Soil Pollutants, Ultrafiltration, Water Movements, Water Pollutants, Chemical
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review