The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evidence for Biomagnification of Gold Nanoparticles within a Terrestrial Food Chain
Abstract
Nanoparticles from the rapidly increasing number of consumer products that contain manufactured nanomaterials are being discharged into waste streams. Increasing evidence suggests that several classes of nanomaterials may accumulate in sludge derived from wastewater treatment and ultimately in soil following land application as biosolids. Little research has been conducted to evaluate the impact of nanoparticles on terrestrial ecosystems, despite the fact that land application of biosolids from wastewater treatment will be a major pathway for the introduction of manufactured nanomaterials to the environment. To begin addressing this knowledge gap, we used the model organisms Nicotiana tabacum L. cv Xanthi and Manduca sexta (tobacco hornworm) to investigate plant uptake and the potential for trophic transfer of 5, 10, and 15 nm diameter gold (Au) nanoparticles (NPs). Samples were analyzed using both bulk analysis by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) as well as spatially resolved methods such as laser ablation inductively coupled mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) and X-ray fluorescence (μXRF). Our results demonstrate trophic transfer and biomagnification of gold nanoparticles from a primary producer to a primary consumer by mean factors of 6.2, 11.6, and 9.6 for the 5, 10, and 15 nm treatments, respectively. This result has important implications for risks associated with nanotechnology, including the potential for human exposure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Toxicity, Uptake, and Translocation of Engineered Nanomaterials in Vascular plants
Miralles, P., Church, T. L., & Harris, A. T. (2012) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es202995d · Cited by 549
Nanotechnology in cosmetics: Opportunities and challenges
Raj, S., Jose, S., Sumod, U., & Sabitha, M. (2012) · Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences · doi:10.4103/0975-7406.99016 · Cited by 545
Larue, C., Castillo-Michel, H., Sobanska, S., Cécillon, L., Bureau, S., Barthès, V., Ouerdane, L., Carrière, M., & Sarret, G. (2014) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.10.053 · Cited by 441
Zuverza-Mena, N., Martínez-Fernández, D., Du, W., Hernandez-Viezcas, J. A., Bonilla-Bird, N., López-Moreno, M. L., Komárek, M., Peralta-Videa, J. R., & Gardea-Torresdey, J. L. (2017) · Plant Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.05.037 · Cited by 426
Servin, A. D., & White, J. C. (2016) · NanoImpact · doi:10.1016/j.impact.2015.12.002 · Cited by 384
Metadata
- Authors
- Judy, J. D., Unrine, J. M., & Bertsch, P. M.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-12-03
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 776-781
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W1965953158
- Cited by
- 376
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence for Biomagnification of Gold Nanoparticles within a Terrestrial Food Chain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es103031a
- The paper
- Judy, J. D., Unrine, J. M., & Bertsch, P. M. (2011). Evidence for Biomagnification of Gold Nanoparticles within a Terrestrial Food Chain. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es103031a
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.