The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Global Distribution of Linear and Cyclic Volatile Methyl Siloxanes in Air
Abstract
The global distribution of linear and cyclic volatile methyl silxoanes (VMS) was investigated at 20 sites worldwide, including 5 locations in the Arctic, using sorbent-impregnated polyurethane foam (SIP) disk passive air samplers. Cyclic VMS are currently being considered for regulation because they are high production volume chemicals that are potentially persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic. Linear and cyclic VMS (including L3, L4, L5, D3, D4, D5, and D6) were analyzed for in air at all urban, background, and Arctic sites. Concentrations of D3 and D4 are significantly correlated, as are D5 and D6, which suggests different sources for these two pairs of compounds. Elevated concentrations of D3 and D4 on the West coast of North America and at high elevation sites suggest these sites are influenced by trans-Pacific transport, while D5 and D6 have elevated concentrations in urban areas, which is most likely due to personal care product use. Measured concentrations of D5 were compared to modeled concentrations generated using both the Danish Eulerian Hemispheric Model (DEHM) and the Berkeley-Trent Global Contaminant Fate Model (BETR Global). The correlation coefficients (r) between the measured and modeled results were 0.73 and 0.58 for the DEHM and BETR models, respectively. Agreement between measurements and models indicate that the sources, transport pathways, and sinks of D5 in the global atmosphere are fairly well understood.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Shoeib, M., Harner, T., Lee, S. C., Lane, D., & Zhu, J. (2008) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac701830s · Cited by 147
Self-citation
Cited by
Wang, D.-G., Norwood, W., Alaee, M., Byer, J. D., & Brimble, S. (2013) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.10.041 · Cited by 284
Rauert, C., Shoieb, M., Schuster, J. K., Eng, A., & Harner, T. (2018) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2018.03.017 · Cited by 125
Self-citationRauert, C., Harner, T., Schuster, J. K., Eng, A., Fillmann, G., Castillo, L. E., Fentanes, O., Villa Ibarra, M., Miglioranza, K. S. B., Moreno Rivadeneira, I., et al. (2018) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.8b00995 · Cited by 59
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Genualdi, S., Harner, T., Cheng, Y., MacLeod, M., Hansen, K. M., van Egmond, R., Shoeib, M., & Lee, S. C.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-03-25
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3349-3354
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2078869898
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.