The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comprehensive Bench- and Pilot-Scale Investigation of Trace Organic Compounds Rejection by Forward Osmosis
Abstract
Forward osmosis (FO) is a membrane separation technology that has been studied in recent years for application in water treatment and desalination. It can best be utilized as an advanced pretreatment for desalination processes such as reverse osmosis (RO) and nanofiltration (NF) to protect the membranes from scaling and fouling. In the current study the rejection of trace organic compounds (TOrCs) such as pharmaceuticals, personal care products, plasticizers, and flame-retardants by FO and a hybrid FO-RO system was investigated at both the bench- and pilot-scales. More than 30 compounds were analyzed, of which 23 nonionic and ionic TOrCs were identified and quantified in the studied wastewater effluent. Results revealed that almost all TOrCs were highly rejected by the FO membrane at the pilot scale while rejection at the bench scale was generally lower. Membrane fouling, especially under field conditions when wastewater effluent is the FO feed solution, plays a substantial role in increasing the rejection of TOrCs in FO. The hybrid FO-RO process demonstrated that the dual barrier treatment of impaired water could lead to more than 99% rejection of almost all TOrCs that were identified in reclaimed water.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kolpin, D. W., Furlong, E. T., Meyer, M. T., Thurman, E. M., Zaugg, S. D., Barber, L. B., & Buxton, H. T. (2002) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es011055j · Cited by 7,953
Indicator compounds for assessment of wastewater effluent contributions to flow and water quality
Dickenson, E. R. V., Snyder, S. A., Sedlak, D. L., & Drewes, J. E. (2011) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2010.11.012 · Cited by 191
Cited by
Recent developments in forward osmosis: Opportunities and challenges
Zhao, S., Zou, L., Tang, C. Y., & Mulcahy, D. (2012) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2011.12.023 · Cited by 1,355
Forward osmosis for application in wastewater treatment: A review
Lutchmiah, K., Verliefde, A. R. D., Roest, K., Rietveld, L. C., & Cornelissen, E. R. (2014) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2014.03.045 · Cited by 766
Removal of contaminants of emerging concern by membranes in water and wastewater: A review
Kim, S., Chu, K. H., Al-Hamadani, Y. A. J., Park, C. M., Jang, M., Kim, D.-H., Yu, M., Heo, J., & Yoon, Y. (2018) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2017.11.044 · Cited by 649
Materials and membrane technologies for water and energy sustainability
Le, N. L., & Nunes, S. P. (2016) · Sustainable Materials and Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.susmat.2016.02.001 · Cited by 432
Membrane-based separation of potential emerging pollutants
Dharupaneedi, S. P., Nataraj, S. K., Nadagouda, M., Reddy, K. R., Shukla, S. S., & Aminabhavi, T. M. (2019) · Separation and Purification Technology · doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2018.09.003 · Cited by 411
Chekli, L., Phuntsho, S., Kim, J. E., Kim, J., Choi, J. Y., Choi, J.-S., Kim, S., Kim, J. H., Hong, S., Sohn, J., et al. (2016) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2015.09.041 · Cited by 340
Osmotic's potential: An overview of draw solutes for forward osmosis
Johnson, D. J., Suwaileh, W. A., Mohammed, A. W., & Hilal, N. (2018) · Desalination · doi:10.1016/j.desal.2017.09.017 · Cited by 287
Xie, M., Nghiem, L. D., Price, W. E., & Elimelech, M. (2013) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es404056e · Cited by 271
Metadata
- Authors
- Hancock, N. T., Xu, P., Heil, D. M., Bellona, C., & Cath, T. Y.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-08-30
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 8483-8490
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2028673237
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
