The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Biotic and Abiotic Interactions in Aquatic Microcosms Determine Fate and Toxicity of Ag Nanoparticles. Part 1. Aggregation and Dissolution
Abstract
To better understand their fate and toxicity in aquatic environments, we compared the aggregation and dissolution behavior of gum arabic (GA) and polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) coated Ag nanoparticles (NPs) in aquatic microcosms. There were four microcosm types: surface water; water and sediment; water and aquatic plants; or water, sediment, and aquatic plants. Dissolution and aggregation behavior of AgNPs were examined using ultracentrifugation, ultrafiltration, and asymmetrical flow field flow fractionation coupled to ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy, dynamic and static laser light scattering, and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Plants released dissolved organic matter (DOM) into the water column either through active or passive processes in response to Ag exposure. This organic matter fraction readily bound Ag ions. The plant-derived DOM had the effect of stabilizing PVP-AgNPs as primary particles, but caused GA-AgNPs to be removed from the water column, likely by dissolution and binding of released Ag ions on sediment and plant surfaces. The destabilization of the GA-AgNPs also corresponded with X-ray absorption near edge spectroscopy results which suggest that 22-28% of the particulate Ag was associated with thiols and 5-14% was present as oxides. The results highlight the potential complexities of nanomaterial behavior in response to biotic and abiotic modifications in ecosystems, and may help to explain differences in toxicity of Ag observed in realistic exposure media compared to simplified laboratory exposures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Interactions of Dissolved Organic Matter with Natural and Engineered Inorganic Colloids: A Review
Philippe, A., & Schaumann, G. E. (2014) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es502342r · Cited by 770
Effects of Engineered Nanomaterials on Plants Growth: An Overview
Aslani, F., Bagheri, S., Muhd Julkapli, N., Juraimi, A. S., Hashemi, F. S. G., & Baghdadi, A. (2014) · The Scientific World Journal · doi:10.1155/2014/641759 · Cited by 437
Wagner, S., Gondikas, A., Neubauer, E., Hofmann, T., & von der Kammer, F. (2014) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201405050 · Cited by 332
Self-citationRelating nanomaterial properties and microbial toxicity
Suresh, A. K., Pelletier, D. A., & Doktycz, M. J. (2013) · Nanoscale · doi:10.1039/c2nr32447d · Cited by 273
Gräfe, M., Donner, E., Collins, R. N., & Lombi, E. (2014) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.aca.2014.02.044 · Cited by 186
Metadata
- Authors
- Unrine, J. M., Colman, B. P., Bone, A. J., Gondikas, A. P., & Matson, C. W.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-06-19
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 6915-6924
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2124708485
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biotic and Abiotic Interactions in Aquatic Microcosms Determine Fate and Toxicity of Ag Nanoparticles. Part 1. Aggregation and Dissolution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es204682q
- The paper
- Unrine, J. M., Colman, B. P., Bone, A. J., Gondikas, A. P., & Matson, C. W. (2012). Biotic and Abiotic Interactions in Aquatic Microcosms Determine Fate and Toxicity of Ag Nanoparticles. Part 1. Aggregation and Dissolution. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es204682q
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.