The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Marginal Emissions Factors for the U.S. Electricity System
Abstract
There is growing interest in reducing emissions from electricity generation in the United States (U.S.). Renewable energy, energy efficiency, and energy conservation are all commonly suggested solutions. Both supply- and demand-side interventions will displace energy-and emissions-from conventional generators. Marginal emissions factors (MEFs) give a consistent metric for assessing the avoided emissions resulting from such interventions. This paper presents the first systematic calculation of MEFs for the U.S. electricity system. Using regressions of hourly generation and emissions data from 2006 through 2011, we estimate regional MEFs for CO(2), NO(x), and SO(2), as well as the share of marginal generation from coal-, gas-, and oil-fired generators. Trends in MEFs with respect to system load, time of day, and month are explored. We compare marginal and average emissions factors (AEFs), finding that AEFs may grossly misestimate the avoided emissions resulting from an intervention. We find significant regional differences in the emissions benefits of avoiding one megawatt-hour of electricity: compared to the West, an equivalent energy efficiency measure in the Midwest is expected to avoid roughly 70% more CO(2), 12 times more SO(2), and 3 times more NO(x) emissions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Energy use and life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of drones for commercial package delivery
Stolaroff, J. K., Samaras, C., O’Neill, E. R., Lubers, A., Mitchell, A. S., & Ceperley, D. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-02411-5 · Cited by 518
Yuksel, T., & Michalek, J. J. (2015) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es505621s · Cited by 380
From Cradle to Junkyard: Assessing the Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Benefits of Electric Vehicles
Archsmith, J., Kendall, A., & Rapson, D. (2015) · Research in Transportation Economics · doi:10.1016/j.retrec.2015.10.007 · Cited by 171
Personal Vehicles Evaluated against Climate Change Mitigation Targets
Miotti, M., Supran, G. J., Kim, E. J., & Trancik, J. E. (2016) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b00177 · Cited by 131
Electricity Generation in LCA of Electric Vehicles: A Review
Marmiroli, B., Messagie, M., Dotelli, G., & Van Mierlo, J. (2018) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app8081384 · Cited by 124
Metadata
- Authors
- Siler-Evans, K., Azevedo, I. L., & Morgan, M. G.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-04-16
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 4742-4748
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2011205796
- Cited by
- 345
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Marginal Emissions Factors for the U.S. Electricity System. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es300145v
- The paper
- Siler-Evans, K., Azevedo, I. L., & Morgan, M. G. (2012). Marginal Emissions Factors for the U.S. Electricity System. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es300145v
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.