The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fate of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles during Anaerobic Digestion of Wastewater and Post-Treatment Processing of Sewage Sludge
Abstract
The rapid development and commercialization of nanomaterials will inevitably result in the release of nanoparticles (NPs) to the environment. As NPs often exhibit physical and chemical properties significantly different from those of their molecular or macrosize analogs, concern has been growing regarding their fate and toxicity in environmental compartments. The wastewater-sewage sludge pathway has been identified as a key release pathway leading to environmental exposure to NPs. In this study, we investigated the chemical transformation of two ZnO-NPs and one hydrophobic ZnO-NP commercial formulation (used in personal care products), during anaerobic digestion of wastewater. Changes in Zn speciation as a result of postprocessing of the sewage sludge, mimicking composting/stockpiling, were also assessed. The results indicated that "native" Zn and Zn added either as a soluble salt or as NPs was rapidly converted to sulfides in all treatments. The hydrophobicity of the commercial formulation retarded the conversion of ZnO-NP. However, at the end of the anaerobic digestion process and after postprocessing of the sewage sludge (which caused a significant change in Zn speciation), the speciation of Zn was similar across all treatments. This indicates that, at least for the material tested, the risk assessment of ZnO-NP through this exposure pathway can rely on the significant knowledge already available in regard to other "conventional" forms of Zn present in sewage sludge.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Comprehensive probabilistic modelling of environmental emissions of engineered nanomaterials
Sun, T. Y., Gottschalk, F., Hungerbühler, K., & Nowack, B. (2014) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2013.10.004 · Cited by 769
Lv, J., Christie, P., & Zhang, S. (2019) · Environmental Science: Nano · doi:10.1039/c8en00645h · Cited by 696
Toxicants inhibiting anaerobic digestion: A review
Chen, J. L., Ortiz, R., Steele, T. W. J., & Stuckey, D. C. (2014) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.10.005 · Cited by 586
Ma, R., Levard, C., Judy, J. D., Unrine, J. M., Durenkamp, M., Martin, B., Jefferson, B., & Lowry, G. V. (2014) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es403646x · Cited by 373
Gräfe, M., Donner, E., Collins, R. N., & Lombi, E. (2014) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.aca.2014.02.044 · Cited by 186
Self-citationDe la Calle, I., Menta, M., & Séby, F. (2016) · Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy · doi:10.1016/j.sab.2016.09.007 · Cited by 99
Metadata
- Authors
- Lombi, E., Donner, E., Tavakkoli, E., Turney, T. W., Naidu, R., Miller, B. W., & Scheckel, K. G.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-07-30
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 9089-9096
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2104289185
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.