Cited by 34Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchProtein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence AnalysisToxic Organic Pollutants Impact

Covalent Binding of Fluorotelomer Unsaturated Aldehydes (FTUALs) and Carboxylic Acids (FTUCAs) to Proteins

Rand, Amy A., Mabury, Scott A.·2013·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

Fluorotelomer unsaturated carboxylic acids and aldehydes (FTUCAs and FTUALs) are intermediate compounds that form from the biotransformation of fluorotelomer-based compounds. Previous evidence that FTUCAs and FTUALs bind to biological nucleophiles has indicated that protein binding might give rise to toxicity resulting from protein function disruption. The current study assesses the reactivity of FTUALs and FTUCAs by probing the covalent interactions of FTUALs and FTUCAs with proteins present in rat liver microsomes and bovine blood plasma. The FTUALs exhibited significant levels of protein covalent binding, with binding levels ranging from 20.1 (±2.8)% to 71.3 (±19.5)% in microsomes and 24.0 (±1.5)% to 82.5 (±14.0)% in blood plasma. By contrast, the FTUCAs did not exhibit any apparent covalent binding. Bovine serum albumin (BSA) was extracted and isolated from the plasma after incubation of 8:2 FTUAL (5-100 μM). Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) was used to investigate the stoichiometry of 8:2 FTUAL covalently bound to BSA; three measurable FTUAL adducts were formed with BSA. To compare the percent binding results from the FTUAL microsome incubation experiments, 8:2 FTOH was incubated in microsomes to determine the protein binding associated with the biotransformation of 8:2 FTOH. Results from this study showed that the biotransformation of 8:2 FTOH yielded 26.1 (±3.0)% binding, and was statistically similar to the percent binding associated with 8:2 FTUAL e…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es303760u

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 55 · Cited by 34

Authors
Rand, A. A., & Mabury, S. A.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Mabury, Scott A.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2013-01-09
Volume
47
Issue
3
Pages
130109073401005
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2317473080
Cited by
34
References
55
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3
FWCI
1.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Keywords
covalent protein binding, biotransformation, liver microsomes, blood plasma, bovine serum albumin, adduct stoichiometry, toxicity, perfluorinated compounds
MeSH terms
Aldehydes, Animals, Biotransformation, Carboxylic Acids, Cattle, Environment, Fluorides, Humans, Hydrocarbons, Fluorinated, Microsomes, Liver, Plasma, Protein Binding, Serum Albumin, Bovine, Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review