The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of Transmembrane Hydraulic Pressure on Performance of Forward Osmosis Membranes
Open accessAbstract
Forward osmosis (FO) is an emerging membrane separation process that continues to be tested and implemented in various industrial water and wastewater treatment applications. The growing interests in the technology have prompted laboratories and manufacturers to adopt standard testing methods to ensure accurate comparison of membrane performance under laboratory-controlled conditions; however, standardized methods might not capture specific operating conditions unique to industrial applications. Experiments with cellulose triacetate (CTA) and polyamide thin-film composite (TFC) FO membranes demonstrated that hydraulic transmembrane pressure (TMP), common in industrial operation of FO membrane elements, could affect membrane performance. Experiments were conducted with three FO membranes and with increasing TMP up to a maximum of 50 psi (3.45 bar). The feed solution was a mixture of salts and the draw solution was either a NaCl solution or concentrated seawater at similar osmotic pressure. Results revealed that TMP minimally affected water flux, reverse salt flux (RSF), and solute rejection of the CTA membrane. However, water flux through TFC membranes might slightly increase with increasing TMP, and RSF substantially declines with increasing TMP. It was observed that rejection of feed constituents was influenced by TMP and RSF.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Phenomenological Theory of Ion Solvation. Effective Radii of Hydrated Ions
Nightingale, E. R. (1959) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/j150579a011 · Cited by 3,505
Cited by
Emerging desalination technologies for water treatment: A critical review
Subramani, A., & Jacangelo, J. G. (2015) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2015.02.032 · Cited by 959
Salinity Gradients for Sustainable Energy: Primer, Progress, and Prospects
Yip, N. Y., Brogioli, D., Hamelers, H. V. M., & Nijmeijer, K. (2016) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b03448 · Cited by 388
Chekli, L., Phuntsho, S., Kim, J. E., Kim, J., Choi, J. Y., Choi, J.-S., Kim, S., Kim, J. H., Hong, S., Sohn, J., et al. (2016) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2015.09.041 · Cited by 340
Dewatering algae using an aquaporin-based polyethersulfone forward osmosis membrane
Munshi, F. M., Church, J., McLean, R., Maier, N., Sadmani, A. H. M. A., Duranceau, S. J., & Lee, W. H. (2018) · Separation and Purification Technology · doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2018.04.077 · Cited by 69
Metadata
- Authors
- Coday, B. D., Heil, D. M., Xu, P., & Cath, T. Y.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2013-02-13
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2386-2393
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2327073963
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.