The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fate of CuO and ZnO Nano- and Microparticles in the Plant Environment
Abstract
The environmental fate of metal oxide particles as a function of size was assessed by comparing the behavior of CuO or ZnO nanoparticles (NPs) to that of the corresponding microparticles (MPs) in a sand matrix, with and without wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) growth. After 14 days of incubation in the planted sand, the CuO and ZnO NPs were increased from their nominal sizes of <50 nm and <100 nm, to ~317 nm and ~483 nm, respectively. Accordingly, the negative surface charge of colloids present in aqueous extracts from the sand amended with CuO (-27.0 mV) and ZnO (-10.0 mV) NPs was reduced by the presence of plants, to -19.8 mV and -6.0 mV, respectively. The surface charge of the MPs was not influenced by plants. Plant growth increased dissolution of NPs and MPs of both metal oxides in the sand from <0.3 mg/kg to about 1.0 mg/kg for the CuO products, and from ≤0.6 mg/kg to between 1.0 and 2.2 mg/kg for the Zn products. The NP or MP products reduced wheat root length by ~60% or ~50% from control levels; CuO was more toxic than ZnO. X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) analysis showed that treatments with MPs or NPs of ZnO led to similar accumulations of Zn-phosphate species in the shoots, likely from dissolution of ZnO. Exposure to CuO NPs or MPs resulted in similar XAS spectra for Cu in the shoots explained by plant accumulation of both CuO and Cu(I)-sulfur complexes. These findings demonstrate the similarities between commercial NPs and MPs of CuO or ZnO in wheat plants, with greater root toxicity correlating with smaller particle size. Factors from the sand and the plant modified the aggregation or dissolution of both types of particles, thus, influencing their environmental fates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jiang, J., Oberdörster, G., & Biswas, P. (2009) · Journal of Nanoparticle Research · doi:10.1007/s11051-008-9446-4 · Cited by 1,713
Lee, J., Mahendra, S., & Alvarez, P. J. J. (2010) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn100866w · Cited by 750
Cited by
Antibacterial properties and toxicity from metallic nanomaterials
Vimbela, G., Ngo, S. M., Fraze, C., Yang, L., & Stout, D. A. (2017) · International Journal of Nanomedicine · doi:10.2147/ijn.s134526 · Cited by 640
Revisiting fertilisers and fertilisation strategies for improved nutrient uptake by plants
Bindraban, P. S., Dimkpa, C., Nagarajan, L., Roy, A., & Rabbinge, R. (2015) · Biology and Fertility of Soils · doi:10.1007/s00374-015-1039-7 · Cited by 485
Self-citationUptake, Translocation, and Consequences of Nanomaterials on Plant Growth and Stress Adaptation
Ali, S., Mehmood, A., & Khan, N. (2021) · Journal of Nanomaterials · doi:10.1155/2021/6677616 · Cited by 406
Elmer, W. H., & White, J. C. (2016) · Environmental Science: Nano · doi:10.1039/c6en00146g · Cited by 396
Pradhan, S., Patra, P., Das, S., Chandra, S., Mitra, S., Dey, K. K., Akbar, S., Palit, P., & Goswami, A. (2013) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es402659t · Cited by 371
Metadata
- Authors
- Dimkpa, C. O., Latta, D. E., McLean, J. E., Britt, D. W., Boyanov, M. I., & Anderson, A. J.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2013-04-08
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 4734-4742
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2081740687
- Cited by
- 318
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fate of CuO and ZnO Nano- and Microparticles in the Plant Environment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es304736y
- The paper
- Dimkpa, C. O., Latta, D. E., McLean, J. E., Britt, D. W., Boyanov, M. I., & Anderson, A. J. (2013). Fate of CuO and ZnO Nano- and Microparticles in the Plant Environment. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es304736y
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.