The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Arsenic Methylation in Soils and Its Relationship with Microbial arsM Abundance and Diversity, and As Speciation in Rice
Abstract
Methylation of arsenic in soil influences its environmental behavior and accumulation by plants, but little is known about the factors affecting As methylation. As speciation was determined in the pore waters of six soils from diverse geographical locations over 54 days of incubation under flooded conditions. The concentration of methylated As (monomethylarsonic acid, MMA, and dimethylarsinic acid, DMA) varied from 0 to 85 μg L(-1) (0 - 69% of the total As in pore water). Two Bangladeshi paddy soils contaminated by irrigation of As-laden groundwater produced large concentrations of inorganic As but relatively little methylated As. Two contaminated paddy soils from China produced a transient peak of DMA during the early phase of incubation. Methylated As represented considerable proportions of the total soluble As in the two uncontaminated soils from the UK and U.S. The copy number of the microbial arsenite methyltransferase gene (arsM) correlated positively with soil pH. However, pore-water methylated As correlated negatively with pH or arsM copy number, and positively with dissolved organic C. GeoChip assay revealed considerable arsM diversity among the six soils, with 27-35 out of 66 sequences in the microarray being detected. As speciation in rice plants grown in the soils generally mirrored that in the pore water. The results suggest that methylated As species in plants originated from the soil and As methylation in soil was influenced strongly by the soil conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Effect of redox potential and pH on arsenic speciation and solubility in a contaminated soil
Masscheleyn, P. H., Delaune, R. D., & Patrick, W. H. (1991) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es00020a008 · Cited by 1,073
Arsenic release from flooded paddy soils is influenced by speciation, Eh, pH, and iron dissolution
Yamaguchi, N., Nakamura, T., Dong, D., Takahashi, Y., Amachi, S., & Makino, T. (2011) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.02.044 · Cited by 348
Cited by
Toxic Heavy Metal and Metalloid Accumulation in Crop Plants and Foods
Clemens, S., & Ma, J. F. (2016) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-043015-112301 · Cited by 1,155
Self-citationArsenic and cadmium accumulation in rice and mitigation strategies
Zhao, F.-J., & Wang, P. (2020) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-019-04374-6 · Cited by 624
Self-citationDiversity and Abundance of Arsenic Biotransformation Genes in Paddy Soils from Southern China
Zhang, S.-Y., Zhao, F.-J., Sun, G.-X., Su, J.-Q., Yang, X.-R., Li, H., & Zhu, Y.-G. (2015) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b00028 · Cited by 263
Self-citationPadhye, L. P., Srivastava, P., Jasemizad, T., Bolan, S., Hou, D., Shaheen, S. M., Rinklebe, J., O’Connor, D., Lamb, D., Wang, H., et al. (2023) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.131575 · Cited by 198
New procedures for arsenic speciation: A review
Chen, M.-L., Ma, L.-Y., & Chen, X.-W. (2014) · Talanta · doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2014.02.037 · Cited by 105
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, F.-J., Harris, E., Yan, J., Ma, J., Wu, L., Liu, W., McGrath, S. P., Zhou, J., & Zhu, Y.-G.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2013-06-21
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 7147-7154
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2011372015
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.