The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Colloidal Properties and Stability of Graphene Oxide Nanomaterials in the Aquatic Environment
Abstract
While graphene oxide (GO) has been found to be the most toxic graphene-based nanomaterial, its environmental fate is still unexplored. In this study, the aggregation kinetics and stability of GO were investigated using time-resolved dynamic light scattering over a wide range of aquatic chemistries (pH, salt types (NaCl, MgCl2, CaCl2), ionic strength) relevant to natural and engineered systems. Although pH did not have a notable influence on GO stability from pH 4 to 10, salt type and ionic strength had significant effects on GO stability due to electrical double layer compression, similar to other colloidal particles. The critical coagulation concentration (CCC) values of GO were determined to be 44 mM NaCl, 0.9 mM CaCl2, and 1.3 mM MgCl2. Aggregation and stability of GO in the aquatic environment followed colloidal theory (DLVO and Schulze-Hardy rule), even though GO's shape is not spherical. CCC values of GO were lower than reported fullerene CCC values and higher than reported carbon nanotube CCC values. CaCl2 destabilized GO more aggressively than MgCl2 and NaCl due to the binding capacity of Ca(2+) ions with hydroxyl and carbonyl functional groups of GO. Natural organic matter significantly improved the stability of GO in water primarily due to steric repulsion. Long-term stability studies demonstrated that GO was highly stable in both natural and synthetic surface waters, although it settled quickly in synthetic groundwater. While GO remained stable in synthetic influent wastewater, effluent wastewater collected from a treatment plant rapidly destabilized GO, indicating GO will settle out during the wastewater treatment process and likely accumulate in biosolids and sludge. Overall, our findings indicate that GO nanomaterials will be stable in the natural aquatic environment and that significant aqueous transport of GO is possible.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Geim, A. K., & Novoselov, K. S. (2007) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat1849 · Cited by 39,979
Graphene: Status and Prospects
Geim, A. K. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1158877 · Cited by 13,942
The chemistry of graphene oxide
Dreyer, D. R., Park, S., Bielawski, C. W., & Ruoff, R. S. (2010) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/b917103g · Cited by 11,653
Cited by
Diverse Applications of Nanomedicine
Pelaz, B., Alexiou, C., Alvarez-Puebla, R. A., Alves, F., Andrews, A. M., Ashraf, S., Balogh, L. P., Ballerini, L., Bestetti, A., Brendel, C., et al. (2017) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.6b06040 · Cited by 1,350
Self-citationRecent advances in carbon nanomaterial-based adsorbents for water purification
Gusain, R., Kumar, N., & Ray, S. S. (2020) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2019.213111 · Cited by 566
Chowdhury, I., Mansukhani, N. D., Guiney, L. M., Hersam, M. C., & Bouchard, D. (2015) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b01866 · Cited by 284
Self-citationHuang, D., Wang, X., Zhang, C., Zeng, G., Peng, Z., Zhou, J., Cheng, M., Wang, R., Hu, Z., & Qin, X. (2017) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.07.154 · Cited by 208
Size-dependent aggregation of graphene oxide
Szabo, T., Maroni, P., & Szilagyi, I. (2020) · Carbon · doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2020.01.022 · Cited by 137
Metadata
- Authors
- Chowdhury, I., Duch, M. C., Mansukhani, N. D., Hersam, M. C., & Bouchard, D.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2013-05-28
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 6288-6296
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2071070571
- Cited by
- 582
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 19.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.