Estimating the Carbon Sequestration Capacity of Shale Formations Using Methane Production Rates
Abstract
Hydraulically fractured shale formations are being developed widely for oil and gas production. They could also represent an attractive repository for permanent geologic carbon sequestration. Shales have a low permeability, but they can adsorb an appreciable amount of CO2 on fracture surfaces. Here, a computational method is proposed for estimating the CO2 sequestration capacity of a fractured shale formation and it is applied to the Marcellus shale in the eastern United States. The model is based on historical and projected CH4 production along with published data and models for CH4/CO2 sorption equilibria and kinetics. The results suggest that the Marcellus shale alone could store between 10.4 and 18.4 Gt of CO2 between now and 2030, which represents more than 50% of total U.S. CO2 emissions from stationary sources over the same period. Other shale formations with comparable pressure-temperature conditions, such as Haynesville and Barnett, could provide significant additional storage capacity. The mass transfer kinetic results indicate that injection of CO2 would proceed several times faster than production of CH4. Additional considerations not included in this model could either reinforce (e.g., leveraging of existing extraction and monitoring infrastructure) or undermine (e.g., leakage or seismicity potential) this approach, but the sequestration capacity estimated here supports continued exploration into this pathway for producing carbon neutral energy.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
“Green” path from fossil-based to hydrogen economy: An overview of carbon-neutral technologies
MURADOV, N., & VEZIROGLU, T. (2008) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.08.054 · Cited by 980 · see citing works
Life Cycle Inventory of CO<sub>2</sub> in an Enhanced Oil Recovery System
Jaramillo, P., Griffin, W. M., & McCoy, S. T. (2009) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es902006h · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An Overview of the Status and Challenges of CO2 Storage in Minerals and Geological Formations
Kelemen, P., Benson, S. M., Pilorgé, H., Psarras, P., & Wilcox, J. (2019) · Frontiers in Climate · doi:10.3389/fclim.2019.00009 · Cited by 587 · see citing works
“…aquifers, depleted oil, and gas reservoirs (may or may not be associated with enhanced oil recovery, i.e., CO2-EOR), possibly hydraulically fractured shale formations, and thick formations of basalt and peridotite (Tao and Clarens, 2013; National Academies of Sciences Engineering Medicine, 2019).”
Background
- Authors
- Tao, Z., & Clarens, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Virginia (US)
- University of Virginia , , Thornton Hall, 351 McCormick Road , Charlottesville , Virginia 22904 ,
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2013-08-29
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 11318-11325
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W1966336294
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8
- FWCI
- 9.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
- Keywords
- carbon sequestration, shale formations, CO2 storage capacity, methane production rate, Marcellus Shale, Haynesville shale, Barnett Shale, CO2 adsorption, sorption kinetics, mass transfer, hydraulic fracturing, CO2 geological storage
- MeSH terms
- Carbon Dioxide, Methane, Geological Phenomena, Carbon Sequestration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review