The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Probiotic Approach to Pathogen Control in Premise Plumbing Systems? A Review
Abstract
Opportunistic pathogens occurring in premise (i.e., building) plumbing systems, including strains of Legionella, Mycobacterium, Acanthamoeba, and Pseudomonas, are now frequently cited agents of waterborne disease outbreaks. Unlike traditional fecal pathogens, opportunistic pathogens are part of the drinking water microbial ecology and therefore require new paradigms for their control. With the onset of the "microbiome era", notions of eradicating all microbes in drinking water have proven unrealistic, making a probiotic concept worthy of consideration. Research is needed to better understand how engineering controls may individually, or in combination, select for a desirable microbiome, and how the microbiome itself may mediate proliferation of opportunistic pathogens. Ecological interactions such as competition, antagonism, and obligate parasite-host relationships offer potential targets for probiotic control of opportunistic pathogens. A probiotic approach may be defined as intentional inoculation of beneficial microbes or choosing conditions that select for a desirable microbiome. This critical review synthesizes the state of the knowledge of the factors governing opportunistic pathogen control in premise plumbing and potential opportunities for and barriers to implementation of a probiotic approach. Future effort is recommended to demonstrate the feasibility of the probiotic concept; to develop effective, practical, and safe protocols; and to engage relevant stakeholders in evaluating options and assessing corresponding risks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Decreased Diversity of the Fecal Microbiome in Recurrent Clostridium difficile–Associated Diarrhea
Chang, J. Y., Antonopoulos, D. A., Kalra, A., Tonelli, A., Khalife, W. T., Schmidt, T. M., & Young, V. B. (2008) · The Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/525047 · Cited by 1,010
Probiotic use in clinical practice: what are the risks?
Boyle, R. J., Robins-Browne, R. M., & Tang, M. L. (2006) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/83.6.1256 · Cited by 776
Khoruts, A., Dicksved, J., Jansson, J. K., & Sadowsky, M. J. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology · doi:10.1097/mcg.0b013e3181c87e02 · Cited by 649
Snydman, D. R. (2008) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/523331 · Cited by 336
Unraveling Mechanisms of Action of Probiotics
Sherman, P. M., Ossa, J. C., & Johnson‐Henry, K. (2009) · Nutrition in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1177/0884533608329231 · Cited by 230
Cited by
Potential impacts of changing supply-water quality on drinking water distribution: A review
Liu, G., Zhang, Y., Knibbe, W.-J., Feng, C., Liu, W., Medema, G., & van der Meer, W. (2017) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2017.03.031 · Cited by 339
Pruden, A. (2014) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es403883p · Cited by 290
Self-citationFalkinham, J. O., Hilborn, E. D., Arduino, M. J., Pruden, A., & Edwards, M. A. (2015) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.1408692 · Cited by 277
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, H., Edwards, M. A., Falkinham, J. O., & Pruden, A.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2013-09-17
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 10117-10128
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2032433726
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 9.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.