The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Anti-Fouling Behavior of Hyperbranched Polyglycerol-Grafted Poly(ether sulfone) Hollow Fiber Membranes for Osmotic Power Generation
Abstract
To sustain high performance of osmotic power generation by pressure-retarded osmosis (PRO) processes, fouling on PRO membranes must be mitigated. This is especially true for the porous support of PRO membranes because its porous structure is very prone to fouling by feeding river water. For the first time, we have successfully designed antifouling PRO thin-film composite (TFC) membranes by synthesizing a dendritic hydrophilic polymer with well-controlled grafting sites, hyperbranched polyglycerol (HPG), and then grafting it on poly(ether sulfone) (PES) hollow fiber membrane supports. Compared to the pristine PES membranes, polydopamine modified membranes, and conventional poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG)-grafted membranes, the HPG grafted membranes show much superior fouling resistance against bovine serum albumin (BSA) adsorption, E. coli adhesion, and S. aureus attachment. In high-pressure PRO tests, the PES TFC membranes are badly fouled by model protein foulants, causing a water flux decline of 31%. In comparison, the PES TFC membrane grafted by HPG not only has an inherently higher water flux and a higher power density but also exhibits better flux recovery up to 94% after cleaning and hydraulic pressure impulsion. Clearly, by grafting the properly designed dendritic polymers to the membrane support, one may substantially sustain PRO hollow fiber membranes for power generation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mussel-inspired surface chemistry for multifunctional coatings
Lee, H., Dellatore, S. M., Miller, W. M., & Messersmith, P. B. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1147241 · Cited by 10,965
Controlled Ring-Opening Polymerization of Lactide and Glycolide
Dechy-Cabaret, O., Martin-Vaca, B., & Bourissou, D. (2004) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr040002s · Cited by 2,257
Structure of Polydopamine: A Never-Ending Story?
Liebscher, J., Mrówczyński, R., Scheidt, H. A., Filip, C., Hădade, N. D., Turcu, R., Bende, A., & Beck, S. (2013) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/la4020288 · Cited by 1,058
Cameron, D. J. A., & Shaver, M. P. (2011) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c0cs00091d · Cited by 421
Cited by
Choudhury, R. R., Gohil, J. M., Mohanty, S., & Nayak, S. K. (2018) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/c7ta08627j · Cited by 420
Salinity Gradients for Sustainable Energy: Primer, Progress, and Prospects
Yip, N. Y., Brogioli, D., Hamelers, H. V. M., & Nijmeijer, K. (2016) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b03448 · Cited by 388
Barclay, T. G., Hegab, H. M., Clarke, S. R., & Ginic‐Markovic, M. (2017) · Advanced Materials Interfaces · doi:10.1002/admi.201601192 · Cited by 384
Pressure-retarded osmosis for power generation from salinity gradients: is it viable?
Straub, A. P., Deshmukh, A., & Elimelech, M. (2016) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c5ee02985f · Cited by 361
Design of omniphobic interfaces for membrane distillation – A review
Lu, K. J., Chen, Y., & Chung, T.-S. (2019) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2019.06.056 · Cited by 304
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, X., Cai, T., & Chung, T.-S.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2014-07-24
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 9898-9907
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2328396510
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 17.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
