The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tracking the Global Generation and Exports of e-Waste. Do Existing Estimates Add up?
Open accessAbstract
The transport of discarded electronic and electrical appliances (e-waste) to developing regions has received considerable attention, but it is difficult to assess the significance of this issue without a quantitative understanding of the amounts involved. The main objective of this study is to track the global transport of e-wastes by compiling and constraining existing estimates of the amount of e-waste generated domestically in each country MGEN, exported from countries belonging to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) MEXP, and imported in countries outside of the OECD MIMP. Reference year is 2005 and all estimates are given with an uncertainty range. Estimates of MGEN obtained by apportioning a global total of ∼ 35,000 kt (range 20,000-50,000 kt) based on a nation's gross domestic product agree well with independent estimates of MGEN for individual countries. Import estimates MIMP to the countries believed to be the major recipients of e-waste exports from the OECD globally (China, India, and five West African countries) suggests that ∼ 5,000 kt (3,600 kt-7,300 kt) may have been imported annually to these non-OECD countries alone, which represents ∼ 23% (17%-34%) of the amounts of e-waste generated domestically within the OECD. MEXP for each OECD country is then estimated by applying this fraction of 23% to its MGEN. By allocating each country's MGEN, MIMP, MEXP and MNET = MGEN + MIMP - MEXP, we can map the global generation and flows of e-waste from OECD to non-OECD countries. While significant uncertainties remain, we note that estimated import into seven non-OECD countries alone are often at the higher end of estimates of exports from OECD countries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lau, W. K.-Y., Chung, S.-S., & Zhang, C. (2013) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2012.09.007 · Cited by 82
Cited by
Reike, D., Vermeulen, W. J. V., & Witjes, S. (2018) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.08.027 · Cited by 1,886
Işıldar, A., van Hullebusch, E. D., Lenz, M., Du Laing, G., Marra, A., Cesaro, A., Panda, S., Akcil, A., Kucuker, M. A., & Kuchta, K. (2019) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.08.050 · Cited by 316
Exploring the planetary boundary for chemical pollution
Diamond, M. L., de Wit, C. A., Molander, S., Scheringer, M., Backhaus, T., Lohmann, R., Arvidsson, R., Bergman, Å., Hauschild, M., Holoubek, I., et al. (2015) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2015.02.001 · Cited by 198
WEEE recycling in Zhejiang Province, China: generation, treatment, and public awareness
Cao, J., Chen, Y., Shi, B., Lu, B., Zhang, X., Ye, X., Zhai, G., Zhu, C., & Zhou, G. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.147 · Cited by 123
WEEE Treatment in Developing Countries: Environmental Pollution and Health Consequences—An Overview
Vaccari, M., Vinti, G., Cesaro, A., Belgiorno, V., Salhofer, S., Dias, M. I., & Jandric, A. (2019) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph16091595 · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- Breivik, K., Armitage, J. M., Wania, F., & Jones, K. C.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2014-07-09
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 8735-8743
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2014714853
- Cited by
- 238
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 41.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.