The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Metabolites of Organophosphate Flame Retardants and 2-Ethylhexyl Tetrabromobenzoate in Urine from Paired Mothers and Toddlers
Abstract
As a result of the polybrominated diphenyl ether (PBDE) ban in the mid-2000s, the chemical flame retardant market has moved toward alterative compounds including chlorinated alkyl and nonchlorinated aryl organophosphate flame retardants (OPFRs) as well as aromatic brominated compounds such as Firemaster 550 (FM550). Recent studies have shown that the OPFRs and Firemaster 550 components are frequently detected in polyurethane foams and in indoor dust. Some OPFRs are considered carcinogenic and/or neurodevelopmental toxicants, and children's exposure to these compounds is a concern. OPFRs are readily metabolized and excreted in the urine as their dialkyl and diaryl compounds which function as biomarkers for OPFR exposure. Limited research has shown that adults are broadly exposed to OPFRs, but nothing is known about children's exposure. Similarly, 2-ethylhexyl-2,3,4,5-tetrabromobenzoate (EH-TBB), a FM550 component, is metabolized to tetrabromobenzoic acid (TBBA). The current study measured levels of bis(1,3-dichloro-2-propyl) phosphate (BDCIPP), bis(1-chloro-2-propyl) phosphate (BCIPP), diphenyl phosphate (DPHP), 2 alkylated DPHPs, and TBBA in urine collected in 2013 from 21 US mother-toddler pairs. BDCIPP, DPHP, and ip-DPHP were detected in 100%, 98%, and 96% of all individuals, whereas BCIPP and tert-butyl-DPHP (tb-DPHP) were only detected in 8% and 13%. Further, TBBA was detected in 27% of adults but 70% of children. Overall, children had higher urinary levels of BDCIPP, DPHP, ip-DPHP, and TBBA as compared to their mothers, suggesting higher exposure. For example, on average, BDCIPP levels in children were 4.9 times those of mothers. BDCIPP and DPHP levels in mother's urine were also significantly correlated with levels in children's urine, suggesting similar exposure routes, likely in the home environment. Various potential predictors of OPFR exposure were assessed using a questionnaire. In children some predictors of hand-mouth exposure were associated with elevated BDCIPP and DPHP levels (e.g., less frequent hand washing for BDCIPP). Overall, these trends are consistent with higher flame retardant levels in children as a result of increased hand-mouth behavior and elevated dust exposure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
High Levels of Organophosphate Flame Retardants in the Great Lakes Atmosphere
Salamova, A., Ma, Y., Venier, M., & Hites, R. A. (2014) · Environmental Science & Technology Letters · doi:10.1021/ez400034n · Cited by 232
Cited by
Indoor exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in the childcare environment
Zheng, G., Boor, B. E., Schreder, E., & Salamova, A. (2020) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113714 · Cited by 112
Metadata
- Authors
- Butt, C. M., Congleton, J., Hoffman, K., Fang, M., & Stapleton, H. M.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2014-08-13
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 10432-10438
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2036484335
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.