The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Degradation of Chlorotriazine Pesticides by Sulfate Radicals and the Influence of Organic Matter
Abstract
Atrazine, propazine, and terbuthylazine are chlorotriazine herbicides that have been frequently used in agriculture and thus are potential drinking water contaminants. Hydroxyl radicals produced by advanced oxidation processes can degrade these persistent compounds. These herbicides are also very reactive with sulfate radicals (2.2-3.5 × 10(9) M(-1) s(-1)). However, the dealkylated products of chlorotriazine pesticides are less reactive toward sulfate radicals (e.g., desethyl-desisopropyl-atrazine (DEDIA; 1.5 × 10(8) M(-1) s(-1))). The high reactivity of the herbicides is largely due to the ethyl or isopropyl group. For example, desisopropyl-atrazine (DIA) reacts quickly (k = 2 × 10(9) M(-1) s(-1)), whereas desethyl-atrazine (DEA) reacts more slowly (k = 9.6 × 10(8) M(-1) s(-1)). The tert-butyl group does not have a strong effect on reaction rate, as shown by the similar second order reaction rates between desethyl-terbuthylazine (DET; k = 3.6 × 10(8) M(-1) s(-1)) and DEDIA. Sulfate radicals degrade a significant proportion of atrazine (63%) via dealkylation, in which deethylation significantly dominates over deisopropylation (10:1). Sulfate and hydroxyl radicals react at an equally fast rate with atrazine (k (hydroxyl radical + atrazine) = 3 × 10(9) M(-1) s(-1)). However, sulfate and hydroxyl radicals differ considerably in their reaction rates with humic acids (k (sulfate radical + humic acids) = 6.8 × 10(3) L mgC(-1) s(-1) (mgC = mg carbon); k (hydroxyl radical + humic acids) = 1.4 × 10(4) L mgC(-1) s(-1)). Thus, in the presence of humic acids, atrazine is degraded more efficiently by sulfate radicals than by hydroxyl radicals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Buxton, G. V., Greenstock, C. L., Helman, W. P., & Ross, A. B. (1988) · Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data · doi:10.1063/1.555805 · Cited by 12,332
Cited by
Wang, J., & Wang, S. (2018) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2017.11.059 · Cited by 4,087
Reactive Species in Advanced Oxidation Processes: Formation, Identification and Reaction Mechanism
Wang, J., & Wang, S. (2020) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2020.126158 · Cited by 1,585
Giannakis, S., Lin, K.-Y. A., & Ghanbari, F. (2021) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2020.127083 · Cited by 1,340
Sulfite-based advanced oxidation and reduction processes for water treatment
Wu, S., Shen, L., Lin, Y., Yin, K., & Yang, C. (2021) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2021.128872 · Cited by 382
Zhou, Y., Jiang, J., Gao, Y., Pang, S.-Y., Yang, Y., Ma, J., Gu, J., Li, J., Wang, Z., Wang, L.-H., et al. (2017) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2017.08.049 · Cited by 346
Metadata
- Authors
- Lutze, H. V., Bircher, S., Rapp, I., Kerlin, N., Bakkour, R., Geisler, M., von Sonntag, C., & Schmidt, T. C.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2015-01-13
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1673-1680
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2333946702
- Cited by
- 584
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.