Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 678

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Properties of Fe-Organic Matter Associations via Coprecipitation versus Adsorption

Chen, Chunmei, Dynes, James J., Wang, Jian, Sparks, Donald L.·2014·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

The association of organic matter (OM) with minerals is recognized as the most important stabilization mechanism for soil organic matter. This study compared the properties of Fe-OM complexes formed from adsorption (reaction of OM to postsynthesis ferrihydrite) versus coprecipitation (formation of Fe solids in the presence of OM). Coprecipitates and adsorption complexes were synthesized using dissolved organic matter (DOM) extracts from a forest little layer at varying molar C/Fe ratios of 0.3-25.0. Sample properties were studied by N2 gas adsorption, XRD, FTIR, Fe EXAFS, and STXM-NEXAFS techniques. Coprecipitation resulted in much higher maximum C contents (∼130 mg g(-1) C difference) in the solid products than adsorption, which may be related to the formation of precipitated insoluble Fe(III)-organic complexes at high C/Fe ratios in the coprecipitates as revealed by Fe EXAFS analysis. Coprecipitation led to a complete blockage of mineral surface sites and pores with ≥177 mg g(-1) C and molar C/Fe ratios ≥2.8 in the solid products. FTIR and STXM-NEXAFS showed that the coprecipitated OM was similar in composition to the adsorbed OM. An enrichment of aromatic C was observed at low C/Fe ratios. Association of carboxyl functional groups with Fe was shown with FTIR and STXM-NEXAFS analysis. STXM-NEXAFS analysis showed a continuous C distribution on minerals. Desorption of the coprecipitated OM was less than that of the adsorbed OM at comparable C/Fe ratios. These results are helpful to understand C and Fe cycling in the natural environments with periodically fluctuating redox conditions, where coprecipitation can occur.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es503669u

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 678

Metadata

Authors
Chen, C., Dynes, J. J., Wang, J., & Sparks, D. L.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2014-11-12
Volume
48
Issue
23
Pages
13751-13759
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2315647024
Cited by
678
References
42
FWCI
14.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.