Cited by 135Environmental Impact and SustainabilityBiofuel production and bioconversionChemistry and Chemical Engineering

Life-cycle fossil energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions of bioderived chemicals and their conventional counterparts

Adom, Felix, Dunn, Jennifer B., Han, Jeongwoo, Sather, Norm·2014·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

Biomass-derived chemical products may offer reduced environmental impacts compared to their fossil-derived counterparts and could improve profit margins at biorefineries when coproduced with higher-volume, lower-profit margin biofuels. It is important to assess on a life-cycle basis the energy and environmental impacts of these bioproducts as compared to conventional, fossil-derived products. We undertook a life-cycle analysis of eight bioproducts produced from either algal-derived glycerol or corn stover-derived sugars. Selected on the basis of technology readiness and market potential, the bioproducts are propylene glycol, 1,3-propanediol, 3-hydroxypropionic acid, acrylic acid, polyethylene, succinic acid, isobutanol, and 1,4-butanediol. We developed process simulations to obtain energy and material flows in the production of each bioproduct and examined sensitivity of these flows to process design assumptions. Conversion process data for fossil-derived products were based on the literature. Conversion process data were combined with upstream parameters in the Greenhouse gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy use in Transportation (GREET) model to generate life-cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and fossil energy consumption (FEC) for each bioproduct and its corresponding petroleum-derived product. The bioproducts uniformly offer GHG emissions reductions compared to their fossil counterparts ranging from 39 to 86% on a cradle-to-grave basis. Similarly, FEC was lower for b…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es503766e

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is no disagreement that bio-based products are considered renewable and potentially offer reduced environmental impacts compared to their petroleum-derived counterparts.

    “There is no disagreement that bio-based products are considered renewable and potentially offer reduced environmental impacts compared to their petroleum-derived counterparts (Adom et al., 2014).”

    From Circular Bioeconomy Concepts—A Perspective (2021) · cites this paper as Adom et al., 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adom, F., Dunn, J. B., Han, J., & Sather, N.
Affiliations
  • Argonne National Laboratory (US)
  • Argonne National Laboratory , 9700 S. Cass Avenue , , ,
Corresponding author
Dunn, Jennifer B.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2014-11-07
Volume
48
Issue
24
Pages
14624-14631
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2315977129
Cited by
135
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5
FWCI
5.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Biomass Program (DE-AC02-06CH11357)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
Keywords
bio-based chemicals, life cycle greenhouse gas emissions, fossil fuel consumption, propylene glycol, 1,3-propanediol, 3-hydroxypropionic acid, acrylic acid, polyethylene, succinic acid, isobutanol, 1,4-butanediol, biorefinery, GREET model, process simulation
MeSH terms
Butanols, Biotechnology, Butylene Glycols, Carbohydrates, Environment, Gases, Glycerol, Models, Theoretical, Petroleum, Propylene Glycols, Transportation, United States, Greenhouse Effect, Biomass, Lactic Acid, Succinic Acid, Biofuels

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review