The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Essential Explanation of the Strong Mineralization Performance of Boron-Doped Diamond Electrodes
Open accessAbstract
Electrochemical oxidation of p-nitrophenol was examined using differentanodic materials, including T/boron-doped diamond (BDD), Ti/SnO2-Sb/PbO2, and Ti/SnO2-Sb anodes. The results demonstrated that Ti/BDD anodes had a much stronger mineralization performance than the other two anodes. Furthermore, it was found that hydroxyl radicals could mainly exist as free hydroxyl radicals at BDD anodes, which could react with organic compounds effectively. This implied that the dominant mechanism for a much higher mineralization capacity of BDD anodes would be attributed to the existence of free hydroxyl radicals in the BDD anode cell rather than adsorbed hydroxyl radicals on the BDD anode. To further corroborate this hypothesis, electrochemical oxidation of p-substituted phenols (p-nitrophenol, p-hydroxybenzaldehyde, phenol, p-cresol, and p-methoxyphenol) was examined at the Ti/BDD, Ti/SnO2-Sb/ PbO2, and Ti/SnO2-Sb anodes, respectively. The study revealed that for Ti/BDD electrodes, the degradation rate of p-substituted phenols (k) increased with the increase of Hammett's constant (sigma), which confirmed the dominance of free hydroxyl radicals at BDD anodes and its effective reaction with organics therein. For Ti/SnO2-Sb/PbO2 electrodes, the degradation rate of p-substituted phenols (k) increased with the increase of initial surface concentration gamma (representing the adsorption capacity of phenols to electrode surface), which indicated that organic compounds mainly reacted with adsorbed hydroxyl radicals at PbO2 anodes. For Ti/SnO2-Sb electrodes, however, k increased with the increase of the integrated parameter S (representing the effects of both sigma and gamma), which implied that organic compounds reacted with both adsorbed hydroxyl radicals and free hydroxyl radicals at SnO2 anodes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Martínez-Huitle, C. A., Rodrigo, M. A., Sirés, I., & Scialdone, O. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00361 · Cited by 1,633
Advanced Oxidation Processes for Wastewater Treatment: Formation of Hydroxyl Radical and Application
WANG, J. L., & XU, L. J. (2012) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643389.2010.507698 · Cited by 1,586
Electrochemical technologies for wastewater treatment and resource reclamation
Feng, Y., Yang, L., Liu, J., & Logan, B. E. (2016) · Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology · doi:10.1039/c5ew00289c · Cited by 371
Degradation and Removal Methods for Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Water
Merino, N., Qu, Y., Deeb, R. A., Hawley, E. L., Hoffmann, M. R., & Mahendra, S. (2016) · Environmental Engineering Science · doi:10.1089/ees.2016.0233 · Cited by 349
Wu, W., Huang, Z.-H., & Lim, T.-T. (2014) · Applied Catalysis A: General · doi:10.1016/j.apcata.2014.04.035 · Cited by 349
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhu, X., Tong, M., Shi, S., Zhao, H., & Ni, J.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-05-21
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 4914-4920
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2053897004
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Essential Explanation of the Strong Mineralization Performance of Boron-Doped Diamond Electrodes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es800298p
- The paper
- Zhu, X., Tong, M., Shi, S., Zhao, H., & Ni, J. (2008). Essential Explanation of the Strong Mineralization Performance of Boron-Doped Diamond Electrodes. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es800298p
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.