The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Root Uptake and Phytotoxicity of ZnO Nanoparticles
Abstract
Increasing application of nanotechnology highlights the need to clarify nanotoxicity. However, few researches have focused on phytotoxicity of nanomaterials; it is unknown whether plants can uptake and transport nanoparticles. This study was to examine cell internalization and upward translocation of ZnO nanoparticles by Lolium perenne (ryegrass). The dissolution of ZnO nanoparticles and its contribution to the toxicity on ryegrass were also investigated. Zn2+ ions were used to compare and verify the root uptake and phytotoxicity of ZnO nanoparticles in a hydroponic culture system. The root uptake and phytotoxicity were visualized by light scanning electron, and transmission electron microscopies. In the presence of ZnO nanoparticles, ryegrass biomass significantly reduced, root tips shrank, and root epidermal and cortical cells highly vacuolated or collapsed. Zn2+ ion concentrations in bulk nutrient solutions with ZnO nanoparticles were lower than the toxicity threshold of Zn2+ to the ryegrass; shoot Zn contents under ZnO nanoparticle treatments were much lower than that under Zn2+ treatments. Therefore, the phytotoxicity of ZnO nanoparticles was not directly from their limited dissolution in the bulk nutrient solution or rhizosphere. ZnO nanoparticles greatly adhered on to the rootsurface. Individual ZnO nanoparticles were observed present in apoplast and protoplast of the root endodermis and stele. However, translocation factors of Zn from root to shoot remained very low under ZnO nanoparticle treatments, and were much lower than that under Zn2+ treatments, implying that little (if any) ZnO nanoparticles could translocate up in the ryegrass in this study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Yin Win, K., & Feng, S.-S. (2005) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.07.050 · Cited by 1,452
Brunner, T. J., Wick, P., Manser, P., Spohn, P., Grass, R. N., Limbach, L. K., Bruinink, A., & Stark, W. J. (2006) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es052069i · Cited by 1,385
Limbach, L. K., Li, Y., Grass, R. N., Brunner, T. J., Hintermann, M. A., Muller, M., Gunther, D., & Stark, W. J. (2005) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es051043o · Cited by 779
Cited by
Potentials of engineered nanoparticles as fertilizers for increasing agronomic productions
Liu, R., & Lal, R. (2015) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.104 · Cited by 1,379
Phytosynthesis of nanoparticles: concept, controversy and application
Husen, A., & Siddiqi, K. S. (2014) · Nanoscale Research Letters · doi:10.1186/1556-276x-9-229 · Cited by 435
Zuverza-Mena, N., Martínez-Fernández, D., Du, W., Hernandez-Viezcas, J. A., Bonilla-Bird, N., López-Moreno, M. L., Komárek, M., Peralta-Videa, J. R., & Gardea-Torresdey, J. L. (2017) · Plant Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.05.037 · Cited by 426
Cytogenetic and genotoxic effects of zinc oxide nanoparticles on root cells of Allium cepa
Kumari, M., Khan, S. S., Pakrashi, S., Mukherjee, A., & Chandrasekaran, N. (2011) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.03.095 · Cited by 401
Effects of Magnetite Nanoparticles on Soybean Chlorophyll
Ghafariyan, M. H., Malakouti, M. J., Dadpour, M. R., Stroeve, P., & Mahmoudi, M. (2013) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es402249b · Cited by 401
Metadata
- Authors
- Lin, D., & Xing, B.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-06-25
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 5580-5585
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2057196029
- Cited by
- 1,169
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 17.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Root Uptake and Phytotoxicity of ZnO Nanoparticles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es800422x
- The paper
- Lin, D., & Xing, B. (2008). Root Uptake and Phytotoxicity of ZnO Nanoparticles. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es800422x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.