The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quantification of the Internal Resistance Distribution of Microbial Fuel Cells
Abstract
Identifying the limiting factors in a microbial fuel cell (MFC) system requires qualifying the contribution of each component of an MFC to internal resistance. In this study, a new method was developed to calculate the internal resistance distribution of an MFC. Experiments were conducted to identify the limiting factors in single-chamber MFCs by varying the anode surface areas, cathode surface areas, and phosphate buffer concentrations. For the MFCs with equally sized electrodes (7 cm2) and 200 mM phosphate buffer, the anode contributed just 5.4% of the internal resistance, while the cathode and the electrolyte each contributed 47.3%, indicating that the anode was not the limiting factor in power generation. The limitation of the cathode was further revealed by the 780% higher area-specific resistance (284.4 omega cm2) than the 32.3 omega cm2 of the anode. The electrolyte limitation was also evidenced by the greatly increased contribution of electrolyte in internal resistance from 47.3 to 78.2% when the concentration of phosphate buffer was decreased from 200 to 50 mM. An anodic power density of 6860 mW/m2 was achieved at a current density of 2.62 mA/cm2 using the MFCs with an anode/cathode area ratio of 1/14 and 200 mM phosphate buffer. The method was also successfully applied to analyze the internal resistance distribution of the two chamber MFCs from a previously reported study. The comparison of the internal resistances of the two air cathode systems indicates that the much lower resistances, including anode, cathode, and membrane resistances, contributed to the much better performance of the single-chamber MFCs than the two-chamber system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Exoelectrogenic bacteria that power microbial fuel cells
Logan, B. E. (2009) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2113 · Cited by 2,383
Logan, B. E., & Rabaey, K. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1217412 · Cited by 1,877
Membrane-based processes for sustainable power generation using water
Logan, B. E., & Elimelech, M. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11477 · Cited by 1,644
Assessment of Microbial Fuel Cell Configurations and Power Densities
Logan, B. E., Wallack, M. J., Kim, K.-Y., He, W., Feng, Y., & Saikaly, P. E. (2015) · Environmental Science & Technology Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.estlett.5b00180 · Cited by 517
Increasing power generation for scaling up single-chamber air cathode microbial fuel cells
Cheng, S., & Logan, B. E. (2011) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.12.104 · Cited by 331
Metadata
- Authors
- Fan, Y., Sharbrough, E., & Liu, H.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-09-24
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 8101-8107
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2167265344
- Cited by
- 613
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantification of the Internal Resistance Distribution of Microbial Fuel Cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es801229j
- The paper
- Fan, Y., Sharbrough, E., & Liu, H. (2008). Quantification of the Internal Resistance Distribution of Microbial Fuel Cells. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es801229j
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.