The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Natural Mercury Isotope Variation in Coal Deposits and Organic Soils
Abstract
There is a need to distinguish among sources of Hg to the atmosphere in order to more fully understand global Hg pollution. In this study we investigate whether coal deposits within the United States, China, and Russia-Kazakhstan, which are three of the five greatest coal-producing regions, have diagnostic Hg isotopic fingerprints that can be used to discriminate among Hg sources. We also investigate the Hg isotopic composition of modern organic soil horizons developed in areas distant from point sources of Hg in North America. Mercury stored in coal deposits displays a wide range of both mass dependent fractionation (MDF, delta202Hg) and mass independent fractionation (MIF, delta201Hg). delta202Hg varies in coals by 3 per thousand and delta201Hg varies by 0.9 per thousand. Combining these two Hg isotope signals results in what may be a unique isotopic "fingerprint" for many coal deposits. Mass independent fractionation of mercury has been demonstrated to occur during photochemical reactions of mercury. This suggests that Hg found in most coal deposits was subjected to photochemical reduction near the Earth's surface prior to deposition. The similarity in MDF and MIF of modern organic soils and coals from North America suggests that Hg deposition from coal may have imprinted an isotopic signature on soils. This research offers a new tool for characterizing mercury inputs from natural and anthropogenic sources to the atmosphere and provides new insights into the geochemistry of mercury in coal and soils.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Atmospheric Influence of Earth's Earliest Sulfur Cycle
Farquhar, J., Bao, H., & Thiemens, M. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.289.5480.756 · Cited by 1,805
Cited by
Zheng, W., & Hintelmann, H. (2009) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.gca.2009.08.016 · Cited by 358
Mercury isotope fractionation during liquid–vapor evaporation experiments
Estrade, N., Carignan, J., Sonke, J. E., & Donard, O. F. X. (2009) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.gca.2009.01.024 · Cited by 277
Geochemistry of Mercury in the Environment
Fitzgerald, W. F., & Lamborg, C. H. (2014) · Treatise on Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-095975-7.00904-9 · Cited by 275
Zheng, W., & Hintelmann, H. (2010) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/jp910353y · Cited by 270
Bergquist, B. A., & Blum, J. D. (2009) · Elements · doi:10.2113/gselements.5.6.353 · Cited by 260
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Biswas, A., Blum, J. D., Bergquist, B. A., Keeler, G. J., & Xie, Z.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-10-08
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 8303-8309
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W1971230551
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.