The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bioaugmentation with Engineered Endophytic Bacteria Improves Contaminant Fate in Phytoremediation
Abstract
Phytoremediation of volatile organic contaminants often proves not ideal because plants and their rhizosphere microbes only partially degrade these compounds. Consequently, plants undergo evapotranspiration that contaminates the ambient air and, thus, undermines the merits of phytoremediation. Under laboratory conditions, endophytic bacteria equipped with the appropriate degradation pathways can improve in planta degradation of volatile organic contaminants. However, several obstacles must be overcome before engineered endophytes will be successful in field-scale phytoremediation projects. Here we report the first in situ inoculation of poplar trees, growing on a TCE-contaminated site, with the TCE-degrading strain Pseudomonas putida W619-TCE. In situ bioaugmentation with strain W619-TCE reduced TCE evapotranspiration by 90% under field conditions. This encouraging result was achieved after the establishment and enrichment of P. putida W619-TCE as a poplar root endophyte and by further horizontal gene transfer of TCE metabolic activity to members of the poplar's endogenous endophytic population. Since P. putida W619-TCE was engineered via horizontal gene transfer, its deliberate release is not restricted under European genetically modified organisms (GMO) regulations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Linear Mixed Models for Longitudinal Data
Verbeke, G. (1997) · Lecture Notes in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-2294-1_3 · Cited by 3,506
Cited by
Mench, M., Lepp, N., Bert, V., Schwitzguébel, J.-P., Gawronski, S. W., Schröder, P., & Vangronsveld, J. (2010) · Journal of Soils and Sediments · doi:10.1007/s11368-010-0190-x · Cited by 413
Self-citationPlant–bacteria partnerships for the remediation of hydrocarbon contaminated soils
Khan, S., Afzal, M., Iqbal, S., & Khan, Q. M. (2013) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.09.045 · Cited by 411
The plant endosphere world – bacterial life within plants
Compant, S., Cambon, M. C., Vacher, C., Mitter, B., Samad, A., & Sessitsch, A. (2021) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/1462-2920.15240 · Cited by 401
Opinion: taking phytoremediation from proven technology to accepted practice
Gerhardt, K. E., Gerwing, P. D., & Greenberg, B. M. (2017) · Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2016.11.016 · Cited by 360
A critical review on exploiting the pharmaceutical potential of plant endophytic fungi
Gupta, S., Chaturvedi, P., Kulkarni, M. G., & Van Staden, J. (2020) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2019.107462 · Cited by 346
Metadata
- Authors
- Weyens, N., van der Lelie, D., Artois, T., Smeets, K., Taghavi, S., Newman, L., Carleer, R., & Vangronsveld, J.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-11-13
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 9413-9418
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W1989329722
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.